All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/hwmon: Fix a build error used with clang compiler
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:12:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875yfxn82r.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221029044230.32128-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>

On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 21:42:30 -0700, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote:
>
> Use REG_FIELD_PREP() and a constant value for hwm_field_scale_and_write()

R-b'ing this so that this can get merged since this compile break is
blocking drm-intel-gt-next pull request:

Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

> If the first argument of FIELD_PREP() is not a compile-time constant value
> or unsigned long long type, this routine of the __BF_FIELD_CHECK() macro
> used internally by the FIELD_PREP() macro always returns false.
>
>  BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__bf_cast_unsigned(_mask, _mask) >      \
>                   __bf_cast_unsigned(_reg, ~0ull),        \
>                   _pfx "type of reg too small for mask"); \
>
> And it returns a build error by the option among the clang
> compilation options. [-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
>
> Reported build error while using clang compiler:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c:115:16: error: result of comparison of constant 18446744073709551615 with expression of type 'typeof (_Generic((field_msk), char: (unsigned char)0, unsigned char: (unsigned char)0, signed char: (unsigned char)0, unsigned short: (unsigned short)0, short: (unsigned short)0, unsigned int: (unsigned int)0, int: (unsigned int)0, unsigned long: (unsigned long)0, long: (unsigned long)0, unsigned long long: (unsigned long long)0, long long: (unsigned long long)0, default: (field_msk)))' (aka 'unsigned int') is always false [-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
>         bits_to_set = FIELD_PREP(field_msk, nval);
>                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/bitfield.h:114:3: note: expanded from macro 'FIELD_PREP'
>                 __BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, 0ULL, _val, "FIELD_PREP: ");    \
>                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/bitfield.h:71:53: note: expanded from macro '__BF_FIELD_CHECK'
>                 BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__bf_cast_unsigned(_mask, _mask) >     \
>                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/build_bug.h:39:58: note: expanded from macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
>                                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/compiler_types.h:357:22: note: expanded from macro 'compiletime_assert'
>         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/compiler_types.h:345:23: note: expanded from macro '_compiletime_assert'
>         __compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix)
>         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/compiler_types.h:337:9: note: expanded from macro '__compiletime_assert'
>                 if (!(condition))                                       \
>
> v2: Use REG_FIELD_PREP() macro instead of FIELD_PREP() (Jani)
>
> Fixes: 99f55efb7911 ("drm/i915/hwmon: Power PL1 limit and TDP setting")
> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c | 12 +++---------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c
> index 9e9781493025..c588a17f97e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c
> @@ -101,21 +101,16 @@ hwm_field_read_and_scale(struct hwm_drvdata *ddat, i915_reg_t rgadr,
>
>  static void
>  hwm_field_scale_and_write(struct hwm_drvdata *ddat, i915_reg_t rgadr,
> -			  u32 field_msk, int nshift,
> -			  unsigned int scale_factor, long lval)
> +			  int nshift, unsigned int scale_factor, long lval)
>  {
>	u32 nval;
> -	u32 bits_to_clear;
> -	u32 bits_to_set;
>
>	/* Computation in 64-bits to avoid overflow. Round to nearest. */
>	nval = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)lval << nshift, scale_factor);
>
> -	bits_to_clear = field_msk;
> -	bits_to_set = FIELD_PREP(field_msk, nval);
> -
>	hwm_locked_with_pm_intel_uncore_rmw(ddat, rgadr,
> -					    bits_to_clear, bits_to_set);
> +					    PKG_PWR_LIM_1,
> +					    REG_FIELD_PREP(PKG_PWR_LIM_1, nval));
>  }
>
>  /*
> @@ -406,7 +401,6 @@ hwm_power_write(struct hwm_drvdata *ddat, u32 attr, int chan, long val)
>	case hwmon_power_max:
>		hwm_field_scale_and_write(ddat,
>					  hwmon->rg.pkg_rapl_limit,
> -					  PKG_PWR_LIM_1,
>					  hwmon->scl_shift_power,
>					  SF_POWER, val);
>		return 0;
> --
> 2.37.1
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-02  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-24 21:09 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/hwmon: Fix a build error used with clang compiler Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-10-25  1:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2022-10-25  1:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-10-25  3:14 ` [PATCH] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-25  3:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-25  9:25   ` Andi Shyti
2022-10-25  9:25     ` Andi Shyti
2022-10-25 16:46     ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-25 16:46       ` [Intel-gfx] " Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-25 18:45     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-25 18:45       ` [Intel-gfx] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-26  0:18       ` Andi Shyti
2022-10-26  0:18         ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-10-27 16:35         ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-27 16:35           ` [Intel-gfx] " Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-27 16:53           ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-27 16:53             ` [Intel-gfx] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-27 17:16             ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-27 17:16               ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-27 18:32               ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-27 18:32                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-28  6:26                 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-10-28  6:26                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-10-28  6:43                 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-10-28  6:43                   ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-10-28  8:46                   ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-28  8:46                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-11-02  6:32                     ` Joonas Lahtinen
2022-11-02 10:41                       ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-11-02 10:41                         ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-10-25  9:15 ` Andi Shyti
2022-10-25 14:27 ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-25 14:30   ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-25 18:46     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-27 17:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/hwmon: Fix a build error used with clang compiler (rev2) Patchwork
2022-10-28  6:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/hwmon: Fix a build error used with clang compiler (rev3) Patchwork
2022-10-28  6:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/hwmon: Fix a build error used with clang compiler (rev4) Patchwork
2022-10-29  4:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/hwmon: Fix a build error used with clang compiler Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-10-31  5:19   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-31  6:37     ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-10-31 17:31       ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-11-01 10:35         ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-02  7:12   ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2022-11-02  8:50     ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-29  5:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/hwmon: Fix a build error used with clang compiler (rev5) Patchwork
2022-10-29  5:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-10-29 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875yfxn82r.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --cc=gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.