From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6AEC28CC0 for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 09:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14727256AB for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 09:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="LWC1laJm" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 14727256AB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50282 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hWHjm-0005fP-9y for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 30 May 2019 05:52:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hWHiz-0005Oi-2c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2019 05:51:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hWHiy-0002We-0e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2019 05:51:53 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x444.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::444]:45222) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hWHix-0002Vn-Mj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2019 05:51:51 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x444.google.com with SMTP id b18so3722814wrq.12 for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 02:51:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z3biaN7oZCkzlCSjB3tHHfF6NrBBgvnm+opDI+3kb0k=; b=LWC1laJmdIQovzZgTBdiJEi/RDsDppW3Q+FptHDY/0ocu7afAKMgbjWFmCB8BOPDVg AWl0+PUdoE1wtE87EYG3Pw3cOF6iBnNcylR7LvlvB1hWAYphSsRlDEmiwJpP1H+pu0jg JoBTtZXUn+9BZUt7gp0MIxJxaHhhTkHhq49Qw737g1intylyxUvYOmZNbyMy88tqYsNe NJDp6e56crIP+JFlqVuBb0zvaG2Stv2okLTC63jx5tdVgb0/T4QPOGepzBSZ4utj1RQ6 ZoRgdO9Qxha8MEUJLxTYFzO8/i03IxnayT+tOiR/UEqV0idByriYXe7gI0RzZLnAo3Pe tZJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z3biaN7oZCkzlCSjB3tHHfF6NrBBgvnm+opDI+3kb0k=; b=AJpgVn6ZmQkpI0TWJwkghgEaPwVghAvnsL9u6/hLuIR8XSuWMEAFOX2K/YX4Z/D8lQ 1NgcoSUt3R/iAtvBjxNbGmzb6Mf8UIjOvOw1pU6IoAotcKIgVGoVHTR2t5lFpTqcNT9y gtsJfsPaKu+iDNx4mD3tgSE96Cl3i1iVMwMHCPtKJxDSzCpC152Mi7fQ2jc67ixERsXl 9xvV1rhKuJg7rjZMBv9cMCF8PZKiITlPRQ/JPRNaEqUwAt1qOczQsWISEig6Mx4HuAWp h31AT3WTnJGjmA/M4YjU5J1OJ/Ykrf+1mfxLkORyrDD0zyo8y5eyFSjMXMTdYjdka2sq OBGg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXGW0PDqGvKAokk3oPsN0KuyMgykbe51te//9uhvXbfRot/DuS6 AnAU2kFAery1Zvdaec+LOLvumw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwlPLuDeOsjMlbNKOTk79KPFMIaD1f0E52i/cAdToXAPIcmDhjslSFfDSxMgQO/lp8sF+Lvag== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6189:: with SMTP id j9mr2026358wru.151.1559209910311; Thu, 30 May 2019 02:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen.linaroharston ([81.128.185.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 205sm2474190wmd.43.2019.05.30.02.51.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 30 May 2019 02:51:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaroharston (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF691FF87; Thu, 30 May 2019 10:51:48 +0100 (BST) References: <20190523234011.583-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <20190523234011.583-4-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.3.2; emacs 26.1 From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 10:51:48 +0100 Message-ID: <875zps5ky3.fsf@zen.linaroharston> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::444 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] docker: update fedora to f30 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Fam Zheng , =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-devel , Gerd Hoffmann Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau writes: > Hi > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:41 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 > wrote: >> >> On 5/24/19 1:40 AM, Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: >> > Released last month. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau >> > --- >> > tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker | 2 +- >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker b/tests/docker/doc= kerfiles/fedora.docker >> > index 69d4a7f5d7..1496b68ba1 100644 >> > --- a/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker >> > +++ b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker >> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ >> > -FROM fedora:29 >> > +FROM fedora:30 >> >> Hmm this patch is pending for review: >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg00819.html > > Oh I missed that. Maybe we should use "latest" to avoid bumping the > version every 6 months. > > fwiw we have different versions: > > tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora-cris-cross.docker:FROM fedora:latest I'll fix that > tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora-i386-cross.docker:FROM fedora:29 The cross compilers images are different as they generally don't want to include the "native" libraries. For Debian based ones we do have a base image that everything builds up from but we haven't bothered for fedora as we only have a few so far. > tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker:FROM fedora:29 > > In 62559b916 "tests: update Fedora i386 cross image to Fedora 29", Daniel= said: > > Using the "latest" tag is not a good idea because this changes what > release it points to every 6 months. Together with caching of docker > builds this can cause confusion where CI has cached & built with Fedo= ra > N, while a developer tries to reproduce a CI problem with Fedora N + = 1, > or vica-verca. > > But at the same time, Daniel bumped f28 to f29 in commit 19a9978db1. > > It's confusing, do we need some stability or follow the latest? > >> >> > ENV PACKAGES \ >> > bc \ >> > bison \ >> > -- Alex Benn=C3=A9e