On Sat, Jan 19 2019, Mike Snitzer wrote:

> Use the same BIO_QUEUE_ENTERED pattern that was established by commit
> cd4a4ae4683dc ("block: don't use blocking queue entered for recursive
> bio submits") by setting BIO_QUEUE_ENTERED after bio_split() and before
> recursing via generic_make_request().
>
> Also add trace_block_split() because it provides useful context about
> bio splits in blktrace.
>
> Depends-on: cd4a4ae4683dc ("block: don't use blocking queue entered for recursive bio submits")
> Fixes: 18a25da84354 ("dm: ensure bio submission follows a depth-first tree walk")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.16+
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
> index fbadda68e23b..6e29c2d99b99 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
> @@ -1654,7 +1654,9 @@ static blk_qc_t __split_and_process_bio(struct mapped_device *md,
>  						   sectors[op_stat_group(bio_op(bio))], ci.sector_count);
>  				part_stat_unlock();
>  
> +				bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_QUEUE_ENTERED);
>  				bio_chain(b, bio);
> +				trace_block_split(md->queue, b, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
>  				ret = generic_make_request(bio);
>  				break;
>  			}
Thanks Mike...

If I understand this correctly, then we need to make the same change for
all other callers of bio_split(), except blk_queue_split().
Maybe we should just set the flag and do the trace in bio_split().
Do you see any harm with doing it that way (in the next merge-window, I
don't suggest you change this patch).

Thanks,
NeilBrown


> -- 
> 2.15.0
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel