From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:37:42 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 05/18] erlang-rebar: bump to version 2.6.1 In-Reply-To: <56C8FE81.8040604@mind.be> (Arnout Vandecappelle's message of "Sun, 21 Feb 2016 01:02:09 +0100") References: <1454443064-14269-1-git-send-email-fhunleth@troodon-software.com> <1454443064-14269-6-git-send-email-fhunleth@troodon-software.com> <56B67620.1040700@gmail.com> <20160220183731.57f5122f@free-electrons.com> <20160220180803.GQ3418@free.fr> <56C8F126.1040903@mind.be> <20160220231928.GR3418@free.fr> <56C8FE81.8040604@mind.be> Message-ID: <8760xicvc9.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle writes: Hi, >> No, it's definitely not clear, as all licensing issues! :-) >> >> Still, I think we should not take the responisibility to do such an >> in-depth licensing analysis, and that we should dtride of the safe side >> by just listing all those licenses that apply (see below). > +1 to that. Yes, agreed. We're after all developers, not lawyers ;) -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard