From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from canardo.mork.no ([148.122.252.1]:57019 "EHLO canardo.mork.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752023Ab2GRHrw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2012 03:47:52 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/package/builddeb: upgrade to current practices References: <1342547874.5129.2.camel@henna.lan> <20120717193951.GA15208@burratino> <20120717212305.GV28778@vostochny.stro.at> <20120718065615.GW28778@vostochny.stro.at> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:47:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20120718065615.GW28778@vostochny.stro.at> (maximilian attems's message of "Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:56:15 +0000") Message-ID: <87629lbjdy.fsf@nemi.mork.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: maximilian attems Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Martin-=C3=89ric?= Racine , Jonathan Nieder , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org maximilian attems writes: > Jonathan already answered it, saying that firmwares are put > in versioned dir. > > Just use git to look it up, easy: > ~/src/linux-next (master %=)$ git log scripts/package/builddeb > > 6607ddadf93d19c7f64139f1475c342152f39fe5 But..but.. won't that prevent installing firmware for more than one builddeb kernel? I.e., shouldn't the fw package name also be versioned if you are going to do this (which it seems you are)? But then again, I thought versioned firmware was dropped from the official packages for good reasons. Any reason why you couldn't add /lib/firmware/something (where "something" is fixed and independent of version) to the firmware.agent search path, and use that for unofficial linux-firmware packages? That would allow unofficial firmware packages from different kernel versions to continue sharing their package name without conflicting with the official packages in any way. Bjørn