From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8E5C4332D for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 22:19:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1782072D for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 22:19:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726980AbgCTWTP (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:19:15 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:37559 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726666AbgCTWTO (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:19:14 -0400 Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jFPyQ-00050m-N3; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:18:38 +0100 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3A4771039FC; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:18:38 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: LKML , "maintainer\:X86 ARCHITECTURE \(32-BIT AND 64-BIT\)" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Gross , Tony Luck , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Linux PM , Srinivas Pandruvada , Len Brown , Paolo Bonzini , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , ACPI Devel Maling List , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Platform Driver , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui , Daniel Lezcano , Amit Kucheria , Chanwoo Choi , Jacob Pan , Adrian Hunter , Ulf Hansson , linux-mmc , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai , ALSA Development Mailing List , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , linux-crypto Subject: Re: [patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros In-Reply-To: References: <20200320131345.635023594@linutronix.de> <20200320131509.564059710@linutronix.de> <87eetmpy56.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:18:38 +0100 Message-ID: <877dzept4x.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-hwmon-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org Andy Shevchenko writes: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:30 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> Andy Shevchenko writes: >> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 9, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 13, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 3, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 4, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), >> > >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0), >> > >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0), >> > >> > Perhaps use names instead of 6 and 15? >> >> Thought about that and did not come up with anyting useful. FAM6 vs. 6 >> is not really any better > > Hmm... Do we have family 15 for Intel? Perhaps I missed something... > Or is it for any family? Pentium 4 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:18:38 +0100 Message-ID: <877dzept4x.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> References: <20200320131345.635023594@linutronix.de> <20200320131509.564059710@linutronix.de> <87eetmpy56.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: LKML , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Gross , Tony Luck , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Linux PM , Srinivas Pandruvada , Len Brown , Paolo Bonzini , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , ACPI Devel Maling List , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Platform Driver , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck li List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org Andy Shevchenko writes: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:30 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> Andy Shevchenko writes: >> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 9, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 13, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 3, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 4, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), >> > >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0), >> > >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0), >> > >> > Perhaps use names instead of 6 and 15? >> >> Thought about that and did not come up with anyting useful. FAM6 vs. 6 >> is not really any better > > Hmm... Do we have family 15 for Intel? Perhaps I missed something... > Or is it for any family? Pentium 4 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A027C4332B for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F35AB2074D for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="OySnRDMS" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F35AB2074D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3664D886; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:56:19 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 3664D886 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1584971829; bh=TDulTIa31dsqBFC4Wy278pJyicMsShQOjV07Y1qeyXs=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=OySnRDMSFZ28IdGaKKI9NI1Qm6o2xSgKVuAR4OF3bMRuCxjT6tq1ddBaaBTWi/FMs 4Iybohfu/cFgU/oqxLWwJ8M03BOWZiJNxFsXVrmgCJTGbdSIJH0yyyAhVnCGZ3nkjF mY03hU9Rb8vl+KBx4QYi+966qu3S6x/BWhN6a5vg= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1965F80315; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:47:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 1EB0BF8015B; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:18:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 240E7F800C0 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:18:46 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 240E7F800C0 Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jFPyQ-00050m-N3; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:18:38 +0100 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3A4771039FC; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:18:38 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros In-Reply-To: References: <20200320131345.635023594@linutronix.de> <20200320131509.564059710@linutronix.de> <87eetmpy56.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:18:38 +0100 Message-ID: <877dzept4x.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1, SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:47:38 +0100 Cc: Ulf Hansson , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE \(32-BIT AND 64-BIT\)" , Viresh Kumar , ALSA Development Mailing List , Platform Driver , Jacob Pan , Srinivas Pandruvada , Amit Kucheria , Mark Gross , Herbert Xu , Chanwoo Choi , Daniel Lezcano , ACPI Devel Maling List , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart , Zhang Rui , Guenter Roeck , Len Brown , Jean Delvare , Linux PM , linux-mmc , Bjorn Helgaas , Takashi Iwai , Adrian Hunter , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , linux-crypto , Paolo Bonzini , "David S. Miller" , Andy Shevchenko X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" Andy Shevchenko writes: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:30 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> Andy Shevchenko writes: >> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 9, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 13, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 3, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 4, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), >> > >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0), >> > >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0), >> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0), >> > >> > Perhaps use names instead of 6 and 15? >> >> Thought about that and did not come up with anyting useful. FAM6 vs. 6 >> is not really any better > > Hmm... Do we have family 15 for Intel? Perhaps I missed something... > Or is it for any family? Pentium 4