From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1032963AbdDTUMV (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:12:21 -0400 Received: from anholt.net ([50.246.234.109]:36744 "EHLO anholt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1032157AbdDTUMS (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:12:18 -0400 From: Eric Anholt To: Florian Fainelli , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Lee Jones , Florian Fainelli , Olof Johansson , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Warren , Stefan Wahren , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Gerd Hoffmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add devicetree for the Raspberry Pi 3, for arm32 (v4) In-Reply-To: <9c076a1e-267a-1a66-7cc0-9dd5bf59c5a8@gmail.com> References: <20170330002605.15213-1-eric@anholt.net> <9c076a1e-267a-1a66-7cc0-9dd5bf59c5a8@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22.2+1~gb0bcfaa (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:12:10 -0700 Message-ID: <877f2e96ud.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Florian Fainelli writes: > On 03/29/2017 05:26 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: >> Raspbian and Fedora have decided to support the Pi3 in 32-bit mode for >> now, so it's useful to be able to test that mode on an upstream >> kernel. It's also been useful for me to use the same board for 32-bit >> and 64-bit development. >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt >> --- >>=20 >> v1: Gerd's patch that put the ../../../arm64/... link in the Makefile >> v2: Michael's patch that #included from ../../../arm64/... in a new >> bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts. >> v3: Mine, using symlinks to make sure that we don't break the split DT >> tree. >> v4: Rely on the new include/arm64 symlink. >>=20 >> Assuming positive review feedback, I assume it would be acceptable to >> merge the shared/dt-symlinks branch in a PR of my own for the 32-bit >> DT branch? > > Either that, or I can take it directly through devicetree/next whichever > you prefer. We have not gotten feedback on whether this looks acceptable > or not though... I would love if you could pull this patch, but it does require shared/dt-symlinks. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE/JuuFDWp9/ZkuCBXtdYpNtH8nugFAlj5FhoACgkQtdYpNtH8 nuieRBAAnf6yQlyXw476/0fjHOr/Lw7/zD7qkghGkyxkIXwpQateCKHcBOzOLgqk Gi1Ao3d4AHWN1Fw+hP6l0Xt4jWwVIl6F+7NRZ6M/V+/ONGGVe5dhTgV+g0RTvujh AufNeoTL4hQSKXU1A3H0EOyESmrgHkqHJo3sMGo740zqDZb3WuBIMZV1qweRLQFp 32AL/ZrPJRUio4fvG+/lQGQJO9d03GVDuFvDbauzPdk4R2H7/ExFclL/U8IvVtgi lWYl/7dn8lJwP4OK/IITuqb4Km2HYKk4bUNe3dH3W0ZnViKvHI7BK+cwuOHudkYQ Ka4zXWiBh0vK70lH2lTJwp1ppBWEJjgSyuRDgw2uFgiYfk6vYaYqiOFmadQEoL9E 4CZ3IByYOc1kAyt57dmuzYzflgcMpq6nClD27M95QvemAJjOloRyc5fHsdr2frfQ dKuNZq3vY9RbW1Jo1LQLhMiEqWgKCOH3vb9m5q9YRvAfPP3kZj2wN95my4E2x6Vl aeIbClXgZeW1Dn7fzIBqNcMMHF81RN9VxVUOwELqTMhs9sCvvmY4WyaYiszmiYZE 69ebT9x8PTrO2RukJ++4NKkX9VEkAMHRgl94LUIVL00akkEJhEVd+TKWODJsZ3ku YGnXrRLzhEgppsGbuGnh+9HahpXjjSC0qRsTzQX2yeOtBELlfmY= =Q8Zc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Anholt Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add devicetree for the Raspberry Pi 3, for arm32 (v4) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:12:10 -0700 Message-ID: <877f2e96ud.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> References: <20170330002605.15213-1-eric@anholt.net> <9c076a1e-267a-1a66-7cc0-9dd5bf59c5a8@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7867424772871777791==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9c076a1e-267a-1a66-7cc0-9dd5bf59c5a8@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Florian Fainelli , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Lee Jones Florian Fainelli , Olof Johansson , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: Stefan Wahren , Stephen Warren , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Gerd Hoffmann , linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --===============7867424772871777791== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Florian Fainelli writes: > On 03/29/2017 05:26 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: >> Raspbian and Fedora have decided to support the Pi3 in 32-bit mode for >> now, so it's useful to be able to test that mode on an upstream >> kernel. It's also been useful for me to use the same board for 32-bit >> and 64-bit development. >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt >> --- >>=20 >> v1: Gerd's patch that put the ../../../arm64/... link in the Makefile >> v2: Michael's patch that #included from ../../../arm64/... in a new >> bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts. >> v3: Mine, using symlinks to make sure that we don't break the split DT >> tree. >> v4: Rely on the new include/arm64 symlink. >>=20 >> Assuming positive review feedback, I assume it would be acceptable to >> merge the shared/dt-symlinks branch in a PR of my own for the 32-bit >> DT branch? > > Either that, or I can take it directly through devicetree/next whichever > you prefer. We have not gotten feedback on whether this looks acceptable > or not though... I would love if you could pull this patch, but it does require shared/dt-symlinks. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE/JuuFDWp9/ZkuCBXtdYpNtH8nugFAlj5FhoACgkQtdYpNtH8 nuieRBAAnf6yQlyXw476/0fjHOr/Lw7/zD7qkghGkyxkIXwpQateCKHcBOzOLgqk Gi1Ao3d4AHWN1Fw+hP6l0Xt4jWwVIl6F+7NRZ6M/V+/ONGGVe5dhTgV+g0RTvujh AufNeoTL4hQSKXU1A3H0EOyESmrgHkqHJo3sMGo740zqDZb3WuBIMZV1qweRLQFp 32AL/ZrPJRUio4fvG+/lQGQJO9d03GVDuFvDbauzPdk4R2H7/ExFclL/U8IvVtgi lWYl/7dn8lJwP4OK/IITuqb4Km2HYKk4bUNe3dH3W0ZnViKvHI7BK+cwuOHudkYQ Ka4zXWiBh0vK70lH2lTJwp1ppBWEJjgSyuRDgw2uFgiYfk6vYaYqiOFmadQEoL9E 4CZ3IByYOc1kAyt57dmuzYzflgcMpq6nClD27M95QvemAJjOloRyc5fHsdr2frfQ dKuNZq3vY9RbW1Jo1LQLhMiEqWgKCOH3vb9m5q9YRvAfPP3kZj2wN95my4E2x6Vl aeIbClXgZeW1Dn7fzIBqNcMMHF81RN9VxVUOwELqTMhs9sCvvmY4WyaYiszmiYZE 69ebT9x8PTrO2RukJ++4NKkX9VEkAMHRgl94LUIVL00akkEJhEVd+TKWODJsZ3ku YGnXrRLzhEgppsGbuGnh+9HahpXjjSC0qRsTzQX2yeOtBELlfmY= =Q8Zc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============7867424772871777791== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --===============7867424772871777791==-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: eric@anholt.net (Eric Anholt) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:12:10 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add devicetree for the Raspberry Pi 3, for arm32 (v4) In-Reply-To: <9c076a1e-267a-1a66-7cc0-9dd5bf59c5a8@gmail.com> References: <20170330002605.15213-1-eric@anholt.net> <9c076a1e-267a-1a66-7cc0-9dd5bf59c5a8@gmail.com> Message-ID: <877f2e96ud.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Florian Fainelli writes: > On 03/29/2017 05:26 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: >> Raspbian and Fedora have decided to support the Pi3 in 32-bit mode for >> now, so it's useful to be able to test that mode on an upstream >> kernel. It's also been useful for me to use the same board for 32-bit >> and 64-bit development. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt >> --- >> >> v1: Gerd's patch that put the ../../../arm64/... link in the Makefile >> v2: Michael's patch that #included from ../../../arm64/... in a new >> bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts. >> v3: Mine, using symlinks to make sure that we don't break the split DT >> tree. >> v4: Rely on the new include/arm64 symlink. >> >> Assuming positive review feedback, I assume it would be acceptable to >> merge the shared/dt-symlinks branch in a PR of my own for the 32-bit >> DT branch? > > Either that, or I can take it directly through devicetree/next whichever > you prefer. We have not gotten feedback on whether this looks acceptable > or not though... I would love if you could pull this patch, but it does require shared/dt-symlinks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 832 bytes Desc: not available URL: