From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ1Av-00064W-27 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:39:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ1An-0007ru-CZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:38:56 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1392904246-15575-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <1392904246-15575-4-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <5306C241.1090403@ozlabs.ru> <53072ABB.1090008@redhat.com> <530EA46D.4090202@ozlabs.ru> <87lhwxf18n.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <530F25E6.4020605@ozlabs.ru> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:38:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <530F25E6.4020605@ozlabs.ru> (Alexey Kardashevskiy's message of "Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:47:50 +1100") Message-ID: <877g8gwu8s.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/6] vl: allow customizing the class of /machine List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf , Andreas Faerber , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Alexey Kardashevskiy writes: > On 02/27/2014 06:44 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Alexey Kardashevskiy writes: >> >>> On 02/21/2014 09:30 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> Il 21/02/2014 04:04, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>>>> On 02/21/2014 12:50 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>>>>> From: Paolo Bonzini >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is a first step towards QOMifying /machine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini >>>>> I got interesting conversation about "sob" in my team so here it is: >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy >>>>> >>>>> Is that enough or I better repost the patch? >>>>> May be patchworks will pick it as it does for "RB" and other "by"'s. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, this is fine. >>> >>> >>> So what is next? >> >> If it doesn't get picked up in a reasonable time frame despite your >> ping, you repost. > > Lately I am having serious doubts that I correctly understand what the > reasonable time frame is. How much do I wait till repost? I guess a ping after a week or two without progress is fair. Repost after it expired from patches (four weeks?), or when it doesn't apply anymore.