From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00EAC433F5 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 13:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC5060F6D for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 13:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349352AbhIHNWe (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2021 09:22:34 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:50876 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349315AbhIHNWd (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2021 09:22:33 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1631107284; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=33Nk/vdkZ6k9Oes7z0H/ATHMundijj8Fk0qr9QwfkIk=; b=zq8PtbrLT33AbqbVp/pDo9T/VRoSiAQ4ImF4KWpx0oa70emvJxn2d6NAXJYUO9Dke7NJK4 Yw/Dif6A8p4eNTo4StYbViHqn0RXCd8HlPWCPpOzjWnTW+g9osr/T5F57XPuMH3/SgtcjE FNATaPVwqn4VIgkJQHqtirHxLDucnafZKhmhHhd0D8r5qn+kgIH06+UE+fKzdaz+fkACgb Cy1ATJYBugIYprujDF7jT4feIEbkaHjPrhmrm7DXZ9BlesVVcujb5r4paKlr/Ye5w5em3l vsNOMSayPFdc55WCNskgaMGLL3LesUvVWSfWvca7aqta/UcGdPNH+SC69ptt9Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1631107284; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=33Nk/vdkZ6k9Oes7z0H/ATHMundijj8Fk0qr9QwfkIk=; b=MUkFNyP+EjH6OwlIQwLhzqgITP8n1CENwsKGu8y34Ib0UDMCwWrMCp+K1qcEk3F8TrF/7R yNNVveBQ6fRyqPBw== To: "Luck, Tony" , LKML Cc: "x86@kernel.org" , Al Viro , Linus Torvalds , Song Liu , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Peter Ziljstra Subject: RE: [patch V2 00/20] x86/fpu: Clean up exception fixups and error handling in sigframe related code In-Reply-To: <87pmtj8x7z.ffs@tglx> References: <20210907195612.321345EED@xen13.tec.linutronix.de> <874kaw9mpo.ffs@tglx> <871r609m2i.ffs@tglx> <87v93c82zn.ffs@tglx> <87sfyg8118.ffs@tglx> <87pmtj8x7z.ffs@tglx> Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 15:21:23 +0200 Message-ID: <878s078ap8.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 08 2021 at 07:14, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08 2021 at 04:06, Tony Luck wrote: > >>>> Huch? That tree is based on 0bcfe68b876 and it just has those 20 patches >>>> on top which should not at all interfere with your root filesystem >>>> device. Let me verify. >>> >>> I lost connection to my test machines. Will continue tomorrow morning. >> >> To save you some time I ran a bisect. It says the wheels fall off the bus at >> patch 13/2 > > Yes, but that's not the real culprit. That's just the messenger. This patch triggers it because it has the left over #PF check from V1. But then I removed the MCE safe fixup from the *SAVE functions, got distracted and tested a stale kernel... I'll send a V3 in a minute Thanks, tglx