All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxram@us.ibm.com, bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Enable MMU_FTR_PKEY
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 23:10:12 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878sfw6b7v.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200619135850.47155-14-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>

"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Parse storage keys related device tree entry in early_init_devtree
> and enable MMU feature MMU_FTR_PKEY if pkeys are supported.
>
> MMU feature is used instead of CPU feature because this enables us
> to group MMU_FTR_KUAP and MMU_FTR_PKEY in asm feature fixup code.

Subject should probably be "Add MMU_FTR_PKEY".

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu.h
> index f4ac25d4df05..72966d3d8f64 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  
>  /* Radix page table supported and enabled */
>  #define MMU_FTR_TYPE_RADIX		ASM_CONST(0x00000040)
> +#define MMU_FTR_PKEY			ASM_CONST(0x00000080)

It's not a type, so it should be with the individual feature bits below:

>  /*
>   * Individual features below.

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> index 6a3bac357e24..6d70797352d8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> @@ -815,6 +815,11 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
>  	/* Now try to figure out if we are running on LPAR and so on */
>  	pseries_probe_fw_features();
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Initialize pkey features and default AMR/IAMR values
> +	 */
> +	pkey_early_init_devtree();

Not your fault, but the fact that we're having to do more and more
initialisation this early, based on the flat device tree, makes me
wonder if we need to rethink how we're doing the CPU/MMU feature setup.

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pkeys.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pkeys.c
> index 0ff59acdbb84..bbba9c601e14 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pkeys.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pkeys.c
> @@ -38,38 +39,45 @@ static int execute_only_key = 2;
>  #define PKEY_REG_BITS (sizeof(u64) * 8)
>  #define pkeyshift(pkey) (PKEY_REG_BITS - ((pkey+1) * AMR_BITS_PER_PKEY))
>  
> +static int __init dt_scan_storage_keys(unsigned long node,
> +				       const char *uname, int depth,
> +				       void *data)
> +{
> +	const char *type = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "device_type", NULL);
> +	const __be32 *prop;
> +	int pkeys_total;
> +
> +	/* We are scanning "cpu" nodes only */
> +	if (type == NULL || strcmp(type, "cpu") != 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	prop = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "ibm,processor-storage-keys", NULL);
> +	if (!prop)
> +		return 0;
> +	pkeys_total = be32_to_cpu(prop[0]);
> +	return pkeys_total;

That's not really the way the return value is meant to be used for these
scanning functions.

The usual return values are 0 to keep scanning and !0 means we've found
the node we're looking for and we should stop scanning.

Doing it this way means if you find 0 pkeys it will keep scanning.

Instead you should pass &pkeys_total as the data pointer and set that.

> +}
> +
>  static int scan_pkey_feature(void)
>  {
> -	u32 vals[2];
> -	int pkeys_total = 0;
> -	struct device_node *cpu;
> +	int pkeys_total;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Pkey is not supported with Radix translation.
>  	 */
> -	if (radix_enabled())
> +	if (early_radix_enabled())
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	cpu = of_find_node_by_type(NULL, "cpu");
> -	if (!cpu)
> -		return 0;
> +	pkeys_total = of_scan_flat_dt(dt_scan_storage_keys, NULL);
> +	if (pkeys_total == 0) {
>  
> -	if (of_property_read_u32_array(cpu,
> -				       "ibm,processor-storage-keys", vals, 2) == 0) {
> -		/*
> -		 * Since any pkey can be used for data or execute, we will
> -		 * just treat all keys as equal and track them as one entity.
> -		 */
> -		pkeys_total = vals[0];
> -		/*  Should we check for IAMR support FIXME!! */

???

> -	} else {

This loses the ability to differentiate between no storage-keys property
at all vs a property that specifies zero keys, which I don't think is a
good change.

>  		/*
>  		 * Let's assume 32 pkeys on P8 bare metal, if its not defined by device
>  		 * tree. We make this exception since skiboot forgot to expose this
>  		 * property on power8.
>  		 */
>  		if (!firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR) &&
> -		    cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTRS_POWER8))
> +		    early_cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTRS_POWER8))
>  			pkeys_total = 32;

That's not how cpu_has_feature() works, we'll need to fix that.

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-06 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-19 13:58 [PATCH v5 00/26] powerpc/book3s/64/pkeys: Simplify the code Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 01/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Fixup bit numbering Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 02/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: pkeys are supported only on hash on book3s Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 03/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Move pkey related bits in the linux page table Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 04/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Explain key 1 reservation details Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 05/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Simplify the key initialization Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 06/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Prevent key 1 modification from userspace Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 07/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: kill cpu feature key CPU_FTR_PKEY Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 08/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Convert execute key support to static key Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-06  7:19   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-06  8:47     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 09/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Simplify pkey disable branch Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 10/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Convert pkey_total to max_pkey Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-06  7:04   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-06  7:20     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-07  1:26       ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 11/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Make initial_allocation_mask static Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-06  7:04   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-06  8:48     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 12/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Mark all the pkeys above max pkey as reserved Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 13/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Enable MMU_FTR_PKEY Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-06 13:10   ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2020-07-06 14:09     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-06 17:17       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-07  1:02         ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 14/26] powerpc/book3s64/kuep: Add MMU_FTR_KUEP Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 15/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Use execute_pkey_disable static key Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-06  7:20   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-06  8:49     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 16/26] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Use MMU_FTR_PKEY instead of pkey_disabled " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 17/26] powerpc/book3s64/keys: Print information during boot Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-06  7:52   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 18/26] powerpc/book3s64/keys/kuap: Reset AMR/IAMR values on kexec Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-06 12:29   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-06 14:39     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-07  1:07       ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 19/26] powerpc/book3s64/kuap: Move KUAP related function outside radix Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-06 12:41   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-06 14:41     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-07  1:22       ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 20/26] powerpc/book3s64/kuep: Move KUEP " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 21/26] powerpc/book3s64/kuap: Rename MMU_FTR_RADIX_KUAP to MMU_FTR_KUAP Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 22/26] powerpc/book3s64/kuap/kuep: Make KUAP and KUEP a subfeature of PPC_MEM_KEYS Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 23/26] powerpc/book3s64/kuap: Move UAMOR setup to key init function Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-07  6:05   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-07 11:25     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 24/26] powerpc/selftest/ptrave-pkey: Rename variables to make it easier to follow code Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 25/26] powerpc/selftest/ptrace-pkey: Update the test to mark an invalid pkey correctly Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-19 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 26/26] powerpc/selftest/ptrace-pkey: IAMR and uamor cannot be updated by ptrace Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878sfw6b7v.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.