From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52C21DA0 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E888F8D for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:44:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Jani Nikula To: Laurent Pinchart , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org In-Reply-To: <2620504.doLR7ekjFm@avalon> References: <1536592110.4035.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <2620504.doLR7ekjFm@avalon> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 11:44:29 +0300 Message-ID: <878t482zki.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] community management/subsystem governance List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > That's also one of my concerns. The differences between subsystems that all > use an email-based review process can already be confusing, or just annoying > to handle, especially when specific tools are mandated (the DRM dim tool or > the ARM patch system come to mind). Note that you don't need to use dim unless you become a committer or a maintainer to a tree that's maintained using dim. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center