From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QK6MX-0007Ck-61 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:09:49 +0200 Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so316170wwb.24 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:07:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.104.2 with SMTP id m2mr1413183wbo.35.1305108422337; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:07:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.1.5] (ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl [84.80.112.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w12sm4926540wby.7.2011.05.11.03.07.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 May 2011 03:07:01 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: Koen Kooi In-Reply-To: <1305105430.30391.314.camel@rex> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 12:06:59 +0200 Message-Id: <87C12AFC-2A77-4031-90A1-BCC777526D3F@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <4DC8CA7E.4020302@linux.intel.com> <4DC97D27.9080602@linux.intel.com> <20110510181314.GF3673@jama.jama.net> <4DC98507.6070103@mentor.com> <1305054238.30391.283.camel@rex> <20110510202417.GB5171@jama.jama.net> <1305105430.30391.314.camel@rex> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: Re: Pull request with misc changes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:09:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:17 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 22:24 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:03:57PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> Martin/Tom: Serious question - why not use the contrib repo for = this? >>=20 >> I have nothing against contrib repo and I'm using oe-core-contrib for >> oe-core stuff, but I had gitorious repos for meta-oe before >> meta-oe-contrib was created and now I didn't feel the need to change = it >> and update my modified meta-oe-create-pull-request header :) but I = will >> if you or koen find it better to pull from *-contrib (I'm pushing shr >> branch there already anyways). >=20 > I have a habit of using the cgit web interface to visualise patches so > using the contrib repo does help me a little. As you say, you're using > oe-core-contrib though so thats fine :) >=20 > FWIW, I find the gitorious web interface extremely painful to the = point > of being unusable to get the information I want from it. Could just be > me but I have to pull trees somewhere else to look at them I find it > that painful. The github one is a lot better, you can even add inline comments using = the gui.=