From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ettkl-0005UL-Md for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 06:30:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ettkk-0007Od-QI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 06:30:31 -0500 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <1520507908-16743-4-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de> (Peter Lieven's message of "Thu, 8 Mar 2018 12:18:26 +0100") References: <1520507908-16743-1-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de> <1520507908-16743-4-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de> Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 12:31:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87a7vierd6.fsf@secure.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] migration/block: rename MAX_INFLIGHT_IO to MAX_IO_BUFFERS List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Lieven Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, dgilbert@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com Peter Lieven wrote: > this actually limits (as the original commit mesage suggests) the > number of I/O buffers that can be allocated and not the number > of parallel (inflight) I/O requests. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela