From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Jarzmik Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/21] regulator: fixed/gpio: Pull inversion/OD into gpiolib Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 10:59:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87a7w87x7m.fsf@belgarion.home> References: <20180212131717.27193-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20180212131717.27193-19-linus.walleij@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from smtp13.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.135]:52649 "EHLO smtp.smtpout.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751067AbeBQKAB (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Feb 2018 05:00:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180212131717.27193-19-linus.walleij@linaro.org> (Linus Walleij's message of "Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:17:14 +0100") Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Shiyan , Haojian Zhuang , Aaro Koskinen , Tony Lindgren , Mike Rapoport , Philipp Zabel , Daniel Mack , Marc Zyngier , Geert Uytterhoeven Linus Walleij writes: > This pushes the handling of inversion semantics and open drain > settings to the GPIO descriptor and gpiolib. All affected board > files are also augmented. Hi Linus, Could we split the patch into chunks, one for i2c, one for pxa, etc ... I fear that exceptionally I have a couple of competing patches for the pxa tree, and a conflict might arise between 3 trees (I2C, MTD, PXA). Otherwise it looks good for the PXA part. Cheers. -- Robert