From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41086) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVxaL-0006JI-4K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 04:40:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVxaF-00011k-Hi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 04:40:17 -0500 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <1479837270-79005-13-git-send-email-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> (Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy's message of "Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:54:25 +0300") References: <1479837270-79005-1-git-send-email-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <1479837270-79005-13-git-send-email-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:40:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87a8agaj9r.fsf@emacs.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/17] migration: add postcopy migration of dirty bitmaps List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, dgilbert@redhat.com, den@openvz.org, jsnow@redhat.com, lirans@il.ibm.com Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > Postcopy migration of dirty bitmaps. Only named dirty bitmaps, > associated with root nodes and non-root named nodes are migrated. > > If destination qemu is already containing a dirty bitmap with the same name > as a migrated bitmap (for the same node), than, if their granularities are > the same the migration will be done, otherwise the error will be generated. > > If destination qemu doesn't contain such bitmap it will be created. > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy > diff --git a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..28e3732 I only did a fast look at this file, nothing obvious is wrong, but it was quick O:-) So Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela