From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC12EC43461 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 22:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB86610C7 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 22:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232851AbhDHWp6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2021 18:45:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48052 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232265AbhDHWp6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2021 18:45:58 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B7D5C061760 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:45:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id u21so5594802ejo.13 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:45:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:user-agent:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=+QnlAplU1dMQ4zW/j3qJHetctVCU9I6oyGBJfW2CGhQ=; b=oHE2R4vU2ooxDZntik0eI7Wbz7ekh95DEkGWKgyn3ePUBTrfCEKIGvar1Z9xmuscbW 5WHKNLSnsIlixggIKdDe2JrtditLmWnnS2D2VY96FM7/XAMEz63I+kpWUTfe4aSeKYN8 AdPx9Lzq4tqHO+HNrvJE/eMMHFLtfkVuc/nKTHyl5qNYybBwpED2U6iZCI3NR6KzHzNO PcGHGtKur/eDCd4YmcIppzrLgcsHKqNBJwf0xmdsW6NfhnBvDQfg8IKi8ETaRmQQmxzD mH/727vCn8O+LP4NWGLx9ma/rXwh6FXtjy2Q60bNyFBOUYHO/NMneqeDbSweOI8XNt0H kbpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:user-agent :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=+QnlAplU1dMQ4zW/j3qJHetctVCU9I6oyGBJfW2CGhQ=; b=sqF4bQlIYwqYOXiDjaP/2yNSOYnBUp0Hw/5iB/FeCmE0l0RWN2iUpbZguq6mFyeh8i eLYl7Xdc/x3GH6c6WAf3JkUP0jn+G5vOKGyvtK8TBVguVzulsHgpFWbS2xnwPk2kAkUW ZIto9PZwMGJuIwD05a9um9qZ1FiOO0Gr1v5g6QHCY/JemCRBdoCuMHuQi4sV9hxG4EaV SrEpELA6sIRGp6JfZW+9KSRMndrB8SuxVJTJzxvnhO0XOcI/9iN9IgLiS+FZEgzpuABZ UuDGp8/b+WUiBi43DzZhsTSNwaT/3pfnfIQQfaE39v4ZAH2LDa8Z2lMsJf/RQ84xAGZH qSHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vHjKh/cztakr+j7euzkUD//BB8dSWfYXgo2hhHS/wI4IqiBzg gqrZN1vqqJJYFujNqPHxUVQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydjcwTs8mBWAbVbtf/vKfRiJGXERnhKn2ZnbQQKx0bLUWDMLa9lV4WLRJdFc2H8/NLZeCKuQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1351:: with SMTP id x17mr13574086ejb.242.1617921945018; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from evledraar (j57224.upc-j.chello.nl. [24.132.57.224]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l1sm367271edt.59.2021.04.08.15.45.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:45:44 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason To: Eric Wong Cc: Junio C Hamano , Georgios Kontaxis , Georgios Kontaxis via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, "brian m. carlson" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] gitweb: redacted e-mail addresses feature. References: <20210329014744.GA2813@dcvr> <8330ef0d7195de461f961d72f90998fa.squirrel@mail.kodaksys.org> <20210408171648.GA7133@dcvr> <20210408211904.GA16486@dcvr> User-agent: Debian GNU/Linux bullseye/sid; Emacs 27.1; mu4e 1.4.15 In-reply-to: <20210408211904.GA16486@dcvr> Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:45:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87blaoieef.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 08 2021, Eric Wong wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Eric Wong writes: >> > As a data point, none of the homograph@ candidates I posted here >> > on Mar 29 have attracted any attempts on my mail server. >> >> That is an interesting observation. All homograph@ non-addresses, >> if a human corrected the funnies in their spelling, would have hit >> whoever handles @80x24.org mailboxes. >> >> I take it to mean that as a future direction, replacing >> with the obfuscated-but-readable-by-humans homographs is a likely >> improvement that would help human users while still inconveniencing >> the crawlers. It may however need some provision to prevent casual >> end-users from cutting-and-pasting these homographs, as you said in >> your original mention of the homograph approach. > > Yes, exactly. > >> But other than that, does the patch look reasonable? > > I only took a cursory glance at it, but v6 seemed fine. Ditto, I left a small nit comment about a needless /i in a regex, but I don't think that needs a re-roll.