All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>
Cc: Daniel Palmer <daniel@thingy.jp>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <yj.chiang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] irqchip/irq-mst: Support polarity configuration
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 13:12:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87blaqpa3s.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210315131848.31840-1-mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>

On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:18:48 +0000,
Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com> wrote:
> 
> Support irq polarity configuration and save and restore the config
> when system suspend and resume.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
> index 143657b0cf28..a2ab3f837b96 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
> @@ -13,15 +13,27 @@
>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
>  
> -#define INTC_MASK	0x0
> -#define INTC_EOI	0x20
> +#define MST_INTC_MAX_IRQS	64
> +
> +#define INTC_MASK		0x0
> +#define INTC_REV_POLARITY	0x10
> +#define INTC_EOI		0x20
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static LIST_HEAD(mst_intc_list);
> +#endif
>  
>  struct mst_intc_chip_data {
>  	raw_spinlock_t	lock;
>  	unsigned int	irq_start, nr_irqs;
>  	void __iomem	*base;
>  	bool		no_eoi;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +	struct list_head entry;
> +	u16 saved_polarity_conf[DIV_ROUND_UP(MST_INTC_MAX_IRQS, 16)];
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  static void mst_set_irq(struct irq_data *d, u32 offset)
> @@ -78,6 +90,20 @@ static void mst_intc_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>  	irq_chip_eoi_parent(d);
>  }
>  
> +static int mst_irq_chip_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
> +{
> +	if (type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING && type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING &&
> +	    type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH && type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> +		return -EINVAL;

All of this amounts to checking for IRQ_TYPE_{NONE,EDGE_BOTH}. Maybe
that's a better option.

> +
> +	if (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING)
> +		mst_set_irq(data, INTC_REV_POLARITY);

What happens if the interrupt was set to LEVEL_LOW, then switched to
LEVEL_HIGH? You end up with a stuck reversed polarity.

> +
> +	type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH;
> +
> +	return irq_chip_set_type_parent(data, type);

I'm going to fix this as below. Shout if you disagree.

Thanks,

	M.

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
index a2ab3f837b96..f6133ae28155 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
@@ -92,16 +92,20 @@ static void mst_intc_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 
 static int mst_irq_chip_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
 {
-	if (type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING && type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING &&
-	    type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH && type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING)
+	switch (type) {
+	case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
+	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
 		mst_set_irq(data, INTC_REV_POLARITY);
+		break;
+	case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
+	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
+		mst_clear_irq(data, INTC_REV_POLARITY);
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
-	type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH;
-
-	return irq_chip_set_type_parent(data, type);
+	return irq_chip_set_type_parent(data, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH);
 }
 
 static struct irq_chip mst_intc_chip = {

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>
Cc: Daniel Palmer <daniel@thingy.jp>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <yj.chiang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] irqchip/irq-mst: Support polarity configuration
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 13:12:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87blaqpa3s.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210315131848.31840-1-mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>

On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:18:48 +0000,
Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com> wrote:
> 
> Support irq polarity configuration and save and restore the config
> when system suspend and resume.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
> index 143657b0cf28..a2ab3f837b96 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
> @@ -13,15 +13,27 @@
>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
>  
> -#define INTC_MASK	0x0
> -#define INTC_EOI	0x20
> +#define MST_INTC_MAX_IRQS	64
> +
> +#define INTC_MASK		0x0
> +#define INTC_REV_POLARITY	0x10
> +#define INTC_EOI		0x20
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static LIST_HEAD(mst_intc_list);
> +#endif
>  
>  struct mst_intc_chip_data {
>  	raw_spinlock_t	lock;
>  	unsigned int	irq_start, nr_irqs;
>  	void __iomem	*base;
>  	bool		no_eoi;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +	struct list_head entry;
> +	u16 saved_polarity_conf[DIV_ROUND_UP(MST_INTC_MAX_IRQS, 16)];
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  static void mst_set_irq(struct irq_data *d, u32 offset)
> @@ -78,6 +90,20 @@ static void mst_intc_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>  	irq_chip_eoi_parent(d);
>  }
>  
> +static int mst_irq_chip_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
> +{
> +	if (type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING && type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING &&
> +	    type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH && type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> +		return -EINVAL;

All of this amounts to checking for IRQ_TYPE_{NONE,EDGE_BOTH}. Maybe
that's a better option.

> +
> +	if (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING)
> +		mst_set_irq(data, INTC_REV_POLARITY);

What happens if the interrupt was set to LEVEL_LOW, then switched to
LEVEL_HIGH? You end up with a stuck reversed polarity.

> +
> +	type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH;
> +
> +	return irq_chip_set_type_parent(data, type);

I'm going to fix this as below. Shout if you disagree.

Thanks,

	M.

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
index a2ab3f837b96..f6133ae28155 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
@@ -92,16 +92,20 @@ static void mst_intc_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 
 static int mst_irq_chip_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
 {
-	if (type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING && type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING &&
-	    type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH && type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING)
+	switch (type) {
+	case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
+	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
 		mst_set_irq(data, INTC_REV_POLARITY);
+		break;
+	case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
+	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
+		mst_clear_irq(data, INTC_REV_POLARITY);
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
-	type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH;
-
-	return irq_chip_set_type_parent(data, type);
+	return irq_chip_set_type_parent(data, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH);
 }
 
 static struct irq_chip mst_intc_chip = {

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>
Cc: Daniel Palmer <daniel@thingy.jp>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <yj.chiang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] irqchip/irq-mst: Support polarity configuration
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 13:12:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87blaqpa3s.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210315131848.31840-1-mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>

On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:18:48 +0000,
Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com> wrote:
> 
> Support irq polarity configuration and save and restore the config
> when system suspend and resume.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
> index 143657b0cf28..a2ab3f837b96 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
> @@ -13,15 +13,27 @@
>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
>  
> -#define INTC_MASK	0x0
> -#define INTC_EOI	0x20
> +#define MST_INTC_MAX_IRQS	64
> +
> +#define INTC_MASK		0x0
> +#define INTC_REV_POLARITY	0x10
> +#define INTC_EOI		0x20
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static LIST_HEAD(mst_intc_list);
> +#endif
>  
>  struct mst_intc_chip_data {
>  	raw_spinlock_t	lock;
>  	unsigned int	irq_start, nr_irqs;
>  	void __iomem	*base;
>  	bool		no_eoi;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +	struct list_head entry;
> +	u16 saved_polarity_conf[DIV_ROUND_UP(MST_INTC_MAX_IRQS, 16)];
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  static void mst_set_irq(struct irq_data *d, u32 offset)
> @@ -78,6 +90,20 @@ static void mst_intc_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>  	irq_chip_eoi_parent(d);
>  }
>  
> +static int mst_irq_chip_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
> +{
> +	if (type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING && type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING &&
> +	    type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH && type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> +		return -EINVAL;

All of this amounts to checking for IRQ_TYPE_{NONE,EDGE_BOTH}. Maybe
that's a better option.

> +
> +	if (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING)
> +		mst_set_irq(data, INTC_REV_POLARITY);

What happens if the interrupt was set to LEVEL_LOW, then switched to
LEVEL_HIGH? You end up with a stuck reversed polarity.

> +
> +	type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH;
> +
> +	return irq_chip_set_type_parent(data, type);

I'm going to fix this as below. Shout if you disagree.

Thanks,

	M.

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
index a2ab3f837b96..f6133ae28155 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mst-intc.c
@@ -92,16 +92,20 @@ static void mst_intc_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 
 static int mst_irq_chip_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
 {
-	if (type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING && type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING &&
-	    type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH && type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING)
+	switch (type) {
+	case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
+	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
 		mst_set_irq(data, INTC_REV_POLARITY);
+		break;
+	case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
+	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
+		mst_clear_irq(data, INTC_REV_POLARITY);
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
-	type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH;
-
-	return irq_chip_set_type_parent(data, type);
+	return irq_chip_set_type_parent(data, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH);
 }
 
 static struct irq_chip mst_intc_chip = {

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-07 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-15 13:18 [PATCH v4] irqchip/irq-mst: Support polarity configuration Mark-PK Tsai
2021-03-15 13:18 ` Mark-PK Tsai
2021-03-15 13:18 ` Mark-PK Tsai
2021-03-25 16:21 ` Mark-PK Tsai
2021-03-25 16:21   ` Mark-PK Tsai
2021-03-25 16:21   ` Mark-PK Tsai
2021-04-07 12:12 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-04-07 12:12   ` [PATCH v4] irqchip/irq-mst: Support polarity configuration Marc Zyngier
2021-04-07 12:12   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-07 12:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-07 12:32   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-07 12:32   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-07 12:38 ` [irqchip: irq/irqchip-next] " irqchip-bot for Mark-PK Tsai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87blaqpa3s.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@thingy.jp \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yj.chiang@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.