From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:59614 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750790AbdHaLJS (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:09:18 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: Igor Mitsyanko , Avinash Patil Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] qtnfmac: implement 64-bit dma support References: <20170829121623.24761-1-sergey.matyukevich.os@quantenna.com> <20170829121623.24761-6-sergey.matyukevich.os@quantenna.com> <87lgm1nh7j.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <20170831094812.utahi5ayz3ag7wrl@bars> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:09:12 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20170831094812.utahi5ayz3ag7wrl@bars> (Sergey Matyukevich's message of "Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:48:12 +0300") Message-ID: <87bmmwro2v.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20170831_130921_954537_84D1DC41) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sergey Matyukevich writes: > Hello Kalle, > >> > - writel(QTN_HOST_LO32(paddr), >> > - PCIE_HDP_TX_HOST_Q_BASE_L(priv->pcie_reg_base)); >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT >> > writel(QTN_HOST_HI32(paddr), >> > PCIE_HDP_TX_HOST_Q_BASE_H(priv->pcie_reg_base)); >> > +#endif >> >> Personally I detest ifdefs and try to write code like this using >> IS_ENABLED(): >> >> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT)) >> writel(QTN_HOST_HI32(paddr), >> PCIE_HDP_TX_HOST_Q_BASE_H(priv->pcie_reg_base)); >> >> But up to you which style you prefer. > > I agree that this way it looks better. But I am using the same ifdef in header > to define QTN_HOST_* macros. So in this particular case I would prefer to > keep the same notation in both source and header files. Ok. I'll try to get these to 4.14 still. -- Kalle Valo