From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45553) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dB4dK-0005tk-3s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 15:29:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dB4dG-0006h7-68 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 15:29:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58424) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dB4dF-0006gt-Vi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 15:29:14 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75DF1C057FA4 for ; Wed, 17 May 2017 19:29:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <20170517165810.18164-3-dgilbert@redhat.com> (David Alan Gilbert's message of "Wed, 17 May 2017 17:58:10 +0100") References: <20170517165810.18164-1-dgilbert@redhat.com> <20170517165810.18164-3-dgilbert@redhat.com> Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 21:29:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87bmqrb7ui.fsf@secure.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] postcopy: Require RAMBlocks that are whole pages List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peterx@redhat.com, lvivier@redhat.com "Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" wrote: > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" > > It turns out that it's legal to create a VM with RAMBlocks that aren't > a multiple of the pagesize in use; e.g. a 1025M main memory using > 2M host pages. That breaks postcopy's atomic placement of pages, > so disallow it. > > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela > } > > /* We don't support postcopy with shared RAM yet */ > - if (qemu_ram_foreach_block(test_range_shared, NULL)) { > + if (qemu_ram_foreach_block(test_ramblock_postcopiable, NULL)) { When I was looking at this code, I still don't know why qemu_ram_foreach_block() don't pass the block directly. It needs it almost all callers. When I saw it I was about to change it, but got sidetracked on other things :-p Later, Juan.