From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751871AbdB0S6V (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:58:21 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:37431 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751710AbdB0S57 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:57:59 -0500 From: Michael Ellerman To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" , Masami Hiramatsu , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: kretprobes: override default function entry offset In-Reply-To: <20170224195722.GM3595@kernel.org> References: <20170224195722.GM3595@kernel.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:56:40 +1100 Message-ID: <87bmtnrdvb.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo writes: > Em Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 07:23:38PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao escreveu: >> With ABIv2, we offset 8 bytes into a function to get at the local entry >> point. > > So, I think I can carry the first one via Ingo, etc, what about this > one? > > Is it ok for me to process it? Yes please. > Seems simple enough, has been thru a lot of discussion, but would be > better if it was Reviewed-by the PPC maintainers or else just processed > by them. > > Please advise, I think it's best if you take it with patch 1. I realise they could go separately, but they make more sense together I think. Acked-by: Michael Ellerman cheers