From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:16:06 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] shapelib: new package In-Reply-To: <20160922034142.itfvvgp56mdxcslu@tarshish> (Baruch Siach's message of "Thu, 22 Sep 2016 06:41:42 +0300") References: <1469969150-3029-1-git-send-email-mr.zoltan.gyarmati@gmail.com> <20160921155729.1c4332b7@free-electrons.com> <20160921164753.j56sstaxx7jy4j66@tarshish> <20160921200430.74f46a81@free-electrons.com> <8760pprm82.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <20160922034142.itfvvgp56mdxcslu@tarshish> Message-ID: <87bmzgqzu1.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Baruch" == Baruch Siach writes: Hi, >> Either that or I update DEVELOPERS when I also update CHANGES, but not >> everyone might want to get listed / might want to get listed without >> being the author of the commit adding the package. > A DEVELOPERS entry is probably most useful when the package is first added, as > it starts showing up in the autobuilder. Delaying the DEVELOPERS update > reduces its usefulness. Correct. I don't think the additional trivial commits to adjust DEVELOPERS are really an issue, so lets just ask people to send a 2nd patch to update the file whenever new packages (or families of packages) are added. -- Venlig hilsen, Peter Korsgaard