From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EFA26E087 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:28:29 -0700 Message-ID: <87czsl2v2q.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" In-Reply-To: <20210614163902.366168-13-jason@jlekstrand.net> References: <20210614163704.365989-1-jason@jlekstrand.net> <20210614163902.366168-13-jason@jlekstrand.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 62/77] tests/i915/gem_workarounds: Convert to intel_ctx_t List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" To: Jason Ekstrand Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org List-ID: On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:38:47 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Just to make sure, this would have worked with the previous code too (i.e. without this patch), correct, using .ctx_id for igt_spin_new? What then is the reason for this patch, is it that intel_ctx_0 is preferred? Anyway the patch is fine so: Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit _______________________________________________ igt-dev mailing list igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev