From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AD98BA4 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:01:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78F2A20C for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:01:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Jani Nikula To: Mark Brown In-Reply-To: <20170420123526.ikqbcuji4jzatbmp@sirena.org.uk> References: <87tw5jscnw.fsf@intel.com> <20170420123526.ikqbcuji4jzatbmp@sirena.org.uk> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:01:48 +0300 Message-ID: <87d1c7s05f.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: ksummit , Dave Airlie , Greg Kroah-Hartman , David Miller , Doug Ledford , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] "Maintainer summit" invitation discussion List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:31:31AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> subsystem/driver. Some maintainers just ignore it completely. >> MAINTAINERS now has the "B:" entry to document where maintainers want >> bugs reported, and I'd like to see more maintainers document their >> preferences there. > > I'd expect that a large proportion of people are assuming the default is > to report it to the list. Seems like the right thing to do is to better document the expectations in Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-bugs.rst, and then point MAINTAINERS and, more importantly, [1] and [2] to that. BR, Jani. [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/page.cgi?id=faq.html [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/page.cgi?id=bug-writing.html -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center