From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53098) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxzWL-00055q-Qv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxzWI-0006bt-Mo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:24:01 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51352) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxzWI-0006bW-H4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:23:58 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8334D2DC342 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:23:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Markus Armbruster References: <20170405194741.18956-1-eblake@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:23:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170405194741.18956-1-eblake@redhat.com> (Eric Blake's message of "Wed, 5 Apr 2017 14:47:28 -0500") Message-ID: <87d1ci5044.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/13] qapi-related cleanups List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Eric Blake writes: > This is a subset of my earlier post "Rip out dynamic JSON parsing"[1], > and then a rebase of that work onto master. It is available here: > > git fetch git://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git qapi-dynamic-json-v3 > > the tag name is a bit of a misnomer for the current series, but is > historically accurate. > > Since v2 [2], I've split up the original patches 2-3 (done manually, > and mixing multiple cleanups into one) into a much longer sequence of > patches 2-11 (separate cleanups in 2, 3, 10, 11, and use of Coccinelle > instead of manual for the bulk of the work); I've also dropped the > original patch 6. I've also addressed some of the comments left by > Markus on v2, although I still couldn't figure out how to use an 'id' > instead of "device":"floppy0" in 12. > > This is 2.10 material, and will probably be a conflict magnet the > longer it is not applied (conversely, since it is now generated by > Coccinelle, it will be a lot easier to regenerate the series if > another round of rebasing is needed). I'm happy to stage this work in my tree for quick merging into 2.10. Looking forward to v4.