From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51357)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1bHoEm-0006Yb-5d
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:19:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1bHoEh-0000xo-9C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:19:16 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55625)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1bHoEh-0000xb-3o
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:19:11 -0400
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
References: <1466777957-5126-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
	<1466777957-5126-3-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA-S+VBrmjoZx0KX2ngGVjiY_a+eFiM0O4tBEL7khVjxLg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87wplbb0mt.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
	<CAFEAcA_WJ8zvJJW7gbKuJViR2Y0e30dqCnNH-hZZcvC0nm044w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:19:08 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_WJ8zvJJW7gbKuJViR2Y0e30dqCnNH-hZZcvC0nm044w@mail.gmail.com>
	(Peter Maydell's message of "Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:02:43 +0100")
Message-ID: <87d1n1ener.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 2/5] tests: New make target
 check-source
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:

> On 27 June 2016 at 07:34, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
>>> This is third-party code. We're not going to change it, so
>>> we should avoid scanning it rather than adding tags which
>>> will get lost next time we do an update to a new upstream
>>> version...
>>
>> I can revive v1's blacklist for this directory.  Any others?
>
> The clean-includes blacklist is
> XDIRREGEX='^(tests/tcg|tests/multiboot|pc-bios|disas/libvixl)'
>
> (which covers both 3rd-party imports and code which is intended to
> be built standalone and so doesn't follow QEMU's include
> rules.)

Noted.

What about linux-headers/ and include/standard-headers/?