On 20.10.22 13:39, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 01:36:19PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >> xen_enable_sysenter() and xen_enable_syscall() can be simplified a lot. >> >> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross >> --- >> arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 23 ++++++----------------- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c >> index cfa99e8f054b..0f33ed6d3a7b 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c >> @@ -910,17 +910,9 @@ static int register_callback(unsigned type, const void *func) >> >> void xen_enable_sysenter(void) >> { >> - int ret; >> - unsigned sysenter_feature; >> - >> - sysenter_feature = X86_FEATURE_SYSENTER32; >> - >> - if (!boot_cpu_has(sysenter_feature)) >> - return; >> - >> - ret = register_callback(CALLBACKTYPE_sysenter, xen_entry_SYSENTER_compat); >> - if(ret != 0) >> - setup_clear_cpu_cap(sysenter_feature); >> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SYSENTER32) && > > Can you switch that and below to cpu_feature_enabled() while at it, pls? > >> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SYSCALL32) && > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Yes, of course. Juergen