From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48053) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fviHO-0001M2-VS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 08:12:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fviAA-00075C-7W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 08:04:33 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:44414 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fviAA-000750-2H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 08:04:30 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1535704738-8986-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <1535704738-8986-9-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 14:04:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1535704738-8986-9-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> (Thomas Huth's message of "Fri, 31 Aug 2018 10:38:57 +0200") Message-ID: <87efeerbcu.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 8/9] tests: add qmp/qom-set-without-value test List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Laurent Vivier , Paolo Bonzini , =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau Thomas Huth writes: > From: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau > > test_qom_set_without_value() is about a bug in infrastructure used by > the QMP core, fixed in commit c489780203. We covered the bug in > infrastructure unit tests (commit bce3035a44). I wrote that test > earlier, to cover QMP level as well, the test could go into qmp-test. > > Signed-off-by: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > --- > tests/qmp-test.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tests/qmp-test.c b/tests/qmp-test.c > index b347228..2b923f0 100644 > --- a/tests/qmp-test.c > +++ b/tests/qmp-test.c > @@ -321,6 +321,19 @@ static void test_qmp_preconfig(void) > qtest_quit(qs); > } >=20=20 > +static void test_qom_set_without_value(void) > +{ > + QTestState *qts; > + QDict *resp; > + > + qts =3D qtest_init(common_args); > + resp =3D qtest_qmp(qts, "{'execute': 'qom-set', 'arguments':" > + " { 'path': '/machine', 'property': 'rtc-time' } }"= ); > + g_assert_nonnull(resp); > + qmp_assert_error_class(resp, "GenericError"); > + qtest_quit(qts); > +} > + > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > { > g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL); > @@ -328,6 +341,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > qtest_add_func("qmp/protocol", test_qmp_protocol); > qtest_add_func("qmp/oob", test_qmp_oob); > qtest_add_func("qmp/preconfig", test_qmp_preconfig); > + qtest_add_func("qmp/qom-set-without-value", test_qom_set_without_val= ue); >=20=20 > return g_test_run(); > } I'm afraid you missed my objection to naming: Message-ID: <8736uvujxx.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-08/msg06368.html If you could work that into PULL v2, I'd be obliged. If not, I'll have to address it in a follow-up patch.