From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40585) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiNWM-0006e2-FF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:42:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiNWI-0005ri-A4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:42:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42628) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiNWI-0005re-5I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:42:54 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1457951704-5217-1-git-send-email-weijg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <1457951704-5217-4-git-send-email-weijg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:42:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1457951704-5217-4-git-send-email-weijg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> (Wei Jiangang's message of "Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:35:04 +0800") Message-ID: <87egb2o9p0.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] pxb-pcie: convert to realize() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wei Jiangang Cc: marcel@redhat.com, caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, ehabkost@redhat.com Wei Jiangang writes: > Signed-off-by: Wei Jiangang > Signed-off-by: Cao jin > --- > hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c | 18 +++++------------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c > index cc5074d..64267d8 100644 > --- a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c > +++ b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c > @@ -314,22 +314,14 @@ static const TypeInfo pxb_dev_info = { > .class_init = pxb_dev_class_init, > }; > > -static int pxb_pcie_dev_initfn(PCIDevice *dev) > +static void pxb_pcie_dev_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp) > { > - Error *err = NULL; > - > if (!pci_bus_is_express(dev->bus)) { > - error_report("pxb-pcie devices cannot reside on a PCI bus!"); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > - > - pxb_dev_realize_common(dev, true, &err); > - if (err) { > - error_report_err(err); > - return -EINVAL; > + error_setg(errp, "pxb-pcie devices cannot reside on a PCI bus!"); Suggest to use the occasion to drop the exclamation mark. > + return; > } > > - return 0; > + pxb_dev_realize_common(dev, true, errp); > } > > static void pxb_pcie_dev_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data) > @@ -337,7 +329,7 @@ static void pxb_pcie_dev_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data) > DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass); > PCIDeviceClass *k = PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(klass); > > - k->init = pxb_pcie_dev_initfn; > + k->realize = pxb_pcie_dev_realize; > k->exit = pxb_dev_exitfn; > k->vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT; > k->device_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_PXB_PCIE; I'd be tempted to squash PATCH 1-3 together, with only the bug fix from PATCH 1 (assuming it is a bug fix) separate. Clearly a matter of taste.