From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46311) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SARhN-00008h-3M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:59:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SARhL-0006gR-FK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:59:56 -0400 Received: from roura.ac.upc.edu ([147.83.33.10]:56012 helo=roura.ac.upc.es) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SARhL-0006gH-4K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:59:55 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Llu=C3=ADs_Vilanova?= References: <20120313200235.24179.63987.stgit@ginnungagap.bsc.es> <20120313200332.24179.78152.stgit@ginnungagap.bsc.es> <87obrrgyoc.fsf@ginnungagap.bsc.es> <87pqc79km7.fsf@ginnungagap.bsc.es> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:59:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Hajnoczi's message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:29:51 +0000") Message-ID: <87ehslsp2m.fsf@ginnungagap.bsc.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/12] trace: [tracetool] Automatically establish available backends and formats List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: harsh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Stefan Hajnoczi writes: [...] > In order to avoid rebasing and porting too many fixes from tracetool > to tracetool.py I suggest you resend this series without the > format/backend consolidation code. I can merge this series quickly > and we can handle the format/backend consolidation code in a separate > patch series. Does this mean removing from this series the patch adding the decorators? Or just re-send all the series after addressing the other concerns? Thanks, Lluis -- "And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn something new, the whole world becomes that much richer." -- The Princess of Pure Reason, as told by Norton Juster in The Phantom Tollbooth