From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Smith Subject: Re: Daily Xen Builds Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:36:25 -0700 Message-ID: <87ek6p8b0m.fsf@us.ibm.com> References: <1129142873.5982.12.camel@dbarrera_tp> <8764s2edei.fsf@us.ibm.com> <1129231660.5978.60.camel@dbarrera_tp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1129231660.5978.60.camel@dbarrera_tp> (David F. Barrera's message of "Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:27:40 -0500") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: David F Barrera Cc: Xen Developers List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org DB> Are we seeing fewer failure? It appears to be similar, or slightly DB> more. Mostly what I meant was that there are fewer FAILs and more XFAILs, which there are. Also, on my machines, I'm seeing almost no unexpected failures. See my machine's latest report: http://xmtest.dague.org/cgi-bin/display?view=single&testid=99 -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms@us.ibm.com