From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA8CC4338F for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 06:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6FAC6125F for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 06:15:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org D6FAC6125F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:55516 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIPiw-0007pO-Or for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 02:15:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIPhp-0006Sm-DR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 02:14:43 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:28414) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIPhl-00086X-T3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 02:14:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1629785676; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=E9QgmNbr3Ni6JbKPizPffRfX1GngH1pksSQ9pyeyLpk=; b=VWzQUQeIfs5kd/JdC64Yt6JuZmE56SazyT+iYPbgegZv99glprl0gR8cVzYOqHyiiY1e7F znXEIRJDevd3ZZ+laXy0+RSs5HSIaGGRKJQ9CVmoJUYz89xLhKmAKjEQ/4vRvomkKP5HGq 9xeXi/HCbF1IkINx7yoqd4V8GOJAffE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-181-RHZk2BlsN5Oavk5wlujfkA-1; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 02:14:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: RHZk2BlsN5Oavk5wlujfkA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 842DD1082928; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 06:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-112-4.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57D8760854; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 06:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E82F611380AA; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:14:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: Peter Maydell Subject: Re: Is QEMU's vmxnet3 still being used? References: <7ec1626e-3c4b-c9e8-1a29-f576163712f5@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:14:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Peter Maydell's message of "Thu, 19 Aug 2021 10:37:09 +0100") Message-ID: <87fsuzpdx8.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=armbru@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.743, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Huth , Dmitry Fleytman , "Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9?=" , Alexander Bulekov , Jason Wang , Leonid Bloch , Andrew Melnychenko , QEMU Developers , Yuri Benditovich , Stefan Hajnoczi Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Peter Maydell writes: > On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 09:54, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: >> We've especially not had "how many users >> are there" as a criteria for acceptance or removal of a device. > > ...not least because we have no accurate way to determine > the answer to that question! I'd like to posit an approximate answer: "enough" if somebody is willing to provide basic care for the code, else "not enough". "Basic care" includes taking care of known bugs. CLOSED/WONTFIX because $reasons is an option. Not even looking is not.