All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Gautam Ramakrishnan <gautamramk@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Mohit P. Tahiliani" <tahiliani@nitk.edu.in>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Leslie Monis <lesliemonis@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/10] pie: rearrange structure members and their initializations
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:02:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ftg8bxw6.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADAms0zvGp4ffqmvZV6RVOTfrosjt6Ht6EkyQ594yJYQFTJBXA@mail.gmail.com>

Gautam Ramakrishnan <gautamramk@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 8:05 PM David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>
>> From: gautamramk@gmail.com
>> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 19:42:44 +0530
>>
>> > From: "Mohit P. Tahiliani" <tahiliani@nitk.edu.in>
>> >
>> > Rearrange the members of the structures such that they appear in
>> > order of their types. Also, change the order of their
>> > initializations to match the order in which they appear in the
>> > structures. This improves the code's readability and consistency.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Mohit P. Tahiliani <tahiliani@nitk.edu.in>
>> > Signed-off-by: Leslie Monis <lesliemonis@gmail.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Gautam Ramakrishnan <gautamramk@gmail.com>
>>
>> What matters for structure member ordering is dense packing and
>> grouping commonly-used-together elements for performance.
>>
> We shall reorder the variables as per their appearance in the
> structure and re-submit. Could you elaborate a bit on dense packing?

The compiler will align struct member offsets according to their size,
adding padding as necessary to achieve this.
So this struct:

struct s1 {
       u32 mem32_1;
       u64 mem64_1;
       u32 mem32_2;
       u64 mem64_2;
};

will have 4 bytes of padding after both mem32_1 and mem32_2, whereas
this struct:

struct s2 {
       u64 mem64_1;
       u32 mem32_1;
       u32 mem32_2;
       u64 mem64_2;
};

won't. So sizeof(struct s1) == 32, and sizeof(struct s2) == 24, and we
say that s2 is densely packed, whereas s1 has holes in it.

The pahole tool is useful to see the layout of compiled structures
(pahole -C). It will also point out any holes.

-Toke


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-21 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-21 14:12 [PATCH net-next v4 00/10] net: sched: add Flow Queue PIE packet scheduler gautamramk
2020-01-21 14:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/10] net: sched: pie: move common code to pie.h gautamramk
2020-01-21 14:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/10] pie: use U64_MAX to denote (2^64 - 1) gautamramk
2020-01-21 14:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/10] pie: rearrange macros in order of length gautamramk
2020-01-21 14:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/10] pie: use u8 instead of bool in pie_vars gautamramk
2020-01-21 14:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/10] pie: rearrange structure members and their initializations gautamramk
2020-01-21 14:35   ` David Miller
2020-01-21 15:44     ` Gautam Ramakrishnan
2020-01-21 16:02       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2020-01-21 16:44         ` Leslie Monis
2020-01-21 16:09       ` David Miller
2020-01-21 16:52         ` Leslie Monis
2020-01-21 14:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/10] pie: improve comments and commenting style gautamramk
2020-01-21 14:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/10] net: sched: pie: fix commenting gautamramk
2020-01-21 14:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/10] net: sched: pie: fix alignment in struct instances gautamramk
2020-01-21 14:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/10] net: sched: pie: export symbols to be reused by FQ-PIE gautamramk
2020-01-21 14:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/10] net: sched: add Flow Queue PIE packet scheduler gautamramk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ftg8bxw6.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gautamramk@gmail.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lesliemonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=tahiliani@nitk.edu.in \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.