From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49C7C04AB6 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C158926927 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:46:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C158926927 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59788 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXibb-00083R-Rx for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 04:46:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41145) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXiZa-0006d5-6a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 04:44:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXiOY-0007XD-Gc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 04:32:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52082) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXiOY-0007Wk-BD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 04:32:42 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D09E27EBB1; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-117-223.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.223]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896444E6CD; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:32:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1B39411386A0; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 10:32:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: Stafford Horne References: <20190529150853.9772-1-armbru@redhat.com> <20190529150853.9772-3-armbru@redhat.com> <20190531033601.GB3379@lianli.shorne-pla.net> Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 10:32:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190531033601.GB3379@lianli.shorne-pla.net> (Stafford Horne's message of "Fri, 31 May 2019 12:36:01 +0900") Message-ID: <87ftort6fw.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Mon, 03 Jun 2019 08:32:41 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS: Improve section headlines X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Cornelia Huck , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Stafford Horne writes: > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 05:08:52PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> When scripts/get_maintainer.pl reports something like >> >> John Doe (maintainer:Overall) >> >> the user is left to wonder *which* of our three "Overall" sections >> applies. We have three, one each under "Guest CPU cores (TCG)", >> "Guest CPU Cores (KVM)", and "Overall usermode emulation". >> >> Rename sections under >> >> * "Guest CPU cores (TCG)" from "FOO" to "FOO CPU cores (TCG)" >> >> * "Guest CPU Cores (KVM)" from "FOO" to "FOO CPU cores (KVM)" >> >> * "Guest CPU Cores (Xen)" from "FOO" to "FOO CPU cores (Xen)" >> >> * "Architecture support" from "FOO" to "FOO general architecture >> support" >> >> * "Tiny Code Generator (TCG)" from "FOO target" to "FOO TCG target" >> >> While there, >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- >> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) > > ... > >> -OpenRISC >> +OpenRISC CPU cores (TCG) >> M: Stafford Horne >> S: Odd Fixes >> F: target/openrisc/ >> F: hw/openrisc/ >> F: tests/tcg/openrisc/ >> > > As directories listed there I look over both target/ (TCG?) and hw/. Same for ARM, LM32, MicroBlaze, MIPS, Moxie, ... > Would it be better to be 'OpenRISC general architecture'? Valid question. Peter, do you have an opinion?