From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devel@linuxdriverproject.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI: hv: fix a couple of issues in hv_pci_onchannelcallback()
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 10:37:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fus9k20i.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160617174451.GA1977@localhost> (Bjorn Helgaas's message of "Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:44:51 -0500")
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 06:53:36PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 04:17:57PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> > kmemleak helped me to identify a memory leak in hv_pci_onchannelcallback()
>> > and while fixing it I stumbled upon an unrelated issue(s) there.
>> >
>> > Vitaly Kuznetsov (2):
>> > PCI: hv: don't leak buffer in hv_pci_onchannelcallback()
>> > PCI: hv: handle all pending messages in hv_pci_onchannelcallback()
>>
>> I applied both to for-linus for v4.7 with Jake's acks, thanks, Vitaly.
>
> Somehow I must have been thinking these were fixes for things we
> merged or broke during the v4.7 merge window, but that doesn't look
> like the case. So I'm going to merge these for v4.8 instead, on the
> theory that the v4.7-rc cycles are primarily for stabilization.
Right, this is not a 4.7 regression.
Thanks!
--
Vitaly
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-19 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-30 14:17 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: hv: fix a couple of issues in hv_pci_onchannelcallback() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-05-30 14:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: hv: don't leak buffer " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-05-31 17:27 ` Jake Oshins
2016-05-30 14:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: hv: handle all pending messages " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-05-31 17:36 ` Jake Oshins
2016-06-10 12:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] PCI: hv: fix a couple of issues " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-06-10 15:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-10 23:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-17 17:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-19 8:37 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fus9k20i.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jakeo@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.