From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22D93C433EF for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 06:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54656 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1njb4r-0005ZJ-Tt for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 02:23:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1njb3V-0004Vq-R5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 02:21:41 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:53373) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1njb3S-0004h6-2h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 02:21:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1651040496; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9fHS3nqPQyHR03iq1g66q6lwIPx8olkIlsR/vHu0bM0=; b=SVnkI7vQbHIIPaVusQccB6ewvYB3t8BfspqS6D9d31OA4om8JPjQtt/aJK0oqr37u6o2SH 25YqlQhc3jsGvLM+/4y2Kj+PTLuAhZ2LVlT2GfrXJr5ie/o0UpItRDgQ5DOJgSx7cyy+Hv ILNV1rvPtt1SyVKCbQawXjduHcfp6Hw= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-564-JcjKnsOgMu-KV6WzVk1pLg-1; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 02:21:32 -0400 X-MC-Unique: JcjKnsOgMu-KV6WzVk1pLg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5946338041C7; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 06:21:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.36.112.3]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0258E40FF708; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 06:21:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2E31821E6889; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:21:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: Peter Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 0/8] support dirty restraint on vCPU References: Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:21:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Peter Xu's message of "Sun, 24 Apr 2022 17:55:18 -0400") Message-ID: <87h76favx1.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.11.54.1 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.082, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Eduardo Habkost , David Hildenbrand , Richard Henderson , Hyman , qemu-devel , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Paolo Bonzini , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Peter Xu writes: > Hi, Yong, > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:52:45AM +0800, Hyman wrote: >> Ping. >> Hi, David and Peter, how do you think this patchset? >> Is it suitable for queueing ? or is there still something need to be done ? > > It keeps looking good to me in general, let's see whether the maintainers > have any comments. Thanks, Whose review is still needed? Or is this ready?