From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 v3] Add ASoC support for AMD Stoney APUs
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 11:49:02 -0700
Message-ID: <87h8wo28o1.fsf@anholt.net>
References: <1503079830-16072-1-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com>
 <CADnq5_NV0wmstpos9Hqc_dbTAOOOUozb=B_-6vd1PhD=zCMLhQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170830151913.6vknazyhh4se5524@sirena.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5604301862887114362=="
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from anholt.net (anholt.net [50.246.234.109])
 by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7997C2665D5
 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 20:52:15 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20170830151913.6vknazyhh4se5524@sirena.org.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, rajeev kumar <rajeevkumar.linux@gmail.com>, Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>, Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

--===============5604301862887114362==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes:

> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:33:35AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
>> Any comments?  Can this patch set go in?  This is the second time I've
>> resent it since the addressing the initial feedback.  Does anyone have
>> a preference on which tree?
>
> You need to get someone from the DRM side to pay attention to the second
> patch and you need to stop resending the first patch since as has been
> pointed out a few times now you need to stop sending the first patch
> which is already in Linus' tree.

Alex *is* from the DRM side and has reviewed that patch.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Q8Lc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

--===============5604301862887114362==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline


--===============5604301862887114362==--