From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50988) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmegn-0001F7-O3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 06:23:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmegj-0008NK-LO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 06:23:41 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:36389) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmegj-0008Mv-Et for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 06:23:37 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id w84so184309431wmg.1 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 03:23:37 -0700 (PDT) References: <20160920135616.2215-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <20160921040901.GC20653@lemon> <87lgylbsj1.fsf@linaro.org> <20160921081018.GA10804@lemon> <87k2e5bn8x.fsf@linaro.org> <20160921100942.GA31288@lemon> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <20160921100942.GA31288@lemon> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:22:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87h999blhw.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] test/docker/Makefile.include: add a generic docker-run target List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Fam Zheng Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Fam Zheng writes: > On Wed, 09/21 10:44, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> FWIW we already have some coverage of the MacOSX builds via Travis >> (although being able to run it quickly on a dev system would be useful). > > Being able to detect breakage earlier than a pull req bounce from Peter would > also be good. True. Although more people have started enabling Travis on their private git trees, we just don't see it as much as IRC doesn't get spammed for anything other than runs against the official tree. > >> >> > >> > I haven't prioritied debootstrap for now, because arm is not too different than >> > x86 in terms of endianness and stuff, and qemu-user is probably much slower >> > than native compilers. >> >> It is much slower although qemu-user can at least take advantage of all >> those extra cores on your server ;-) >> >> 32 bit builds are also an area that needs good coverage as I'm pretty >> sure most devs have only x86_64 boxes these days. > > Yes, test-mingw has it. Ahh cool :-) -- Alex Bennée