From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755451Ab2KHMX6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:23:58 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:51594 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755402Ab2KHMX4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:23:56 -0500 From: Rusty Russell To: Lee Jones Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Pawel Moll , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-mmio: Fix irq parsing in command line parameter In-Reply-To: References: <1352120454.10947.5.camel@hornet> <1352120572-16256-1-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> <20121105134413.GC5220@gmail.com> <87bof93vf2.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:53:40 +1030 Message-ID: <87hap02shf.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Lee Jones writes: >> > Resorted to poaching now have we Pawel? > >> I hope you were joking! > > Yes, of course. I thought that was clearly indicated by the jovial winking > smiley. :) > > I realise it wasn't obvious soley by this exchange, but Pawel and I are > actually ol' friends. > >> Doing your work for you isn't poaching. > > This isn't related to my work, as I have no professional interest in > virtio. In this particular instance I was trying to help out by fixing bugs > uncovered by the use of randconfig, which I'm doing in my own time, as a > hobby. I guess the use my work address clouds this fact, so I apologise for > that. > > Sorry for any confusion or offence caused though Rusty. :) > > Kind regards, > Lee No offence for me. I just don't want bystanders to believe that there is some etiquette other than "best patch wins". Thanks for the clarification! Rusty. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-mmio: Fix irq parsing in command line parameter Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:53:40 +1030 Message-ID: <87hap02shf.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <1352120454.10947.5.camel@hornet> <1352120572-16256-1-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> <20121105134413.GC5220@gmail.com> <87bof93vf2.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Lee Jones writes: >> > Resorted to poaching now have we Pawel? > >> I hope you were joking! > > Yes, of course. I thought that was clearly indicated by the jovial winking > smiley. :) > > I realise it wasn't obvious soley by this exchange, but Pawel and I are > actually ol' friends. > >> Doing your work for you isn't poaching. > > This isn't related to my work, as I have no professional interest in > virtio. In this particular instance I was trying to help out by fixing bugs > uncovered by the use of randconfig, which I'm doing in my own time, as a > hobby. I guess the use my work address clouds this fact, so I apologise for > that. > > Sorry for any confusion or offence caused though Rusty. :) > > Kind regards, > Lee No offence for me. I just don't want bystanders to believe that there is some etiquette other than "best patch wins". Thanks for the clarification! Rusty.