From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:19:43 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] Add sam-ba to at91sam926*_defconfig In-Reply-To: <20120411135031.GS29577@game.jcrosoft.org> (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD's message of "Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:50:31 +0200") References: <1334149610-989-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@piout.net> <20120411153529.73613e03@skate> <20120411135031.GS29577@game.jcrosoft.org> Message-ID: <87hawlbbdc.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Jean-Christophe" == Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD writes: Hi, Jean-Christophe> this soc config I disagree Jean-Christophe> I run on ARM and PPC and samba is x86 only You build buildroot ON ARM/PPC? That's very uncommon (well, gcc110 is ppc64 - But still). Nevertheless, nothing breaks by including sam-ba in the build, your host dir just gets a little bit bigger. In this case I would say the advantage for the common case (build on x86 for at91 development) outweighs the minor disadvantage for your use case. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard