All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sparse: Skip TCID and TST_TOTAL
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 13:56:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ilw9lour.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211130114527.5942-1-chrubis@suse.cz>

Hello,

Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> writes:

> Since these are part of the old library API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> ---
>  tools/sparse/sparse-ltp.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/sparse/sparse-ltp.c b/tools/sparse/sparse-ltp.c
> index b1677d336..1a3b4089a 100644
> --- a/tools/sparse/sparse-ltp.c
> +++ b/tools/sparse/sparse-ltp.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,9 @@ static void check_symbol_visibility(const struct symbol *const sym)
>  	if (!(mod & MOD_TOPLEVEL))
>  		return;
>  
> +	if (!strcmp(name, "TCID") || !strcmp(name, "TST_TOTAL"))
> +		return;

Would it be better to print a warning that old library crap has been
detected?

My expectation is that 'make check' will produce a lot of noise if ran
on tests which haven't even been converted to the new library. Also it's
possible someone may forget to remove TCID etc.

> +
>  	if (has_lib_prefix && (mod & MOD_STATIC) && !(mod & MOD_INLINE)) {
>  		warning(sym->pos,
>  			"LTP-003: Symbol '%s' has the LTP public library prefix, but is static (private).",
> -- 
> 2.32.0


-- 
Thank you,
Richard.

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-30 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-30 11:45 [LTP] [PATCH] sparse: Skip TCID and TST_TOTAL Cyril Hrubis
2021-11-30 13:56 ` Richard Palethorpe [this message]
2021-11-30 14:27   ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-12-01  7:21     ` Richard Palethorpe
2021-12-07 12:54 ` [LTP] [PATCH] check: Deprecated API symbols Richard Palethorpe via ltp
2021-12-07 12:59   ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-12-07 14:09     ` Richard Palethorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ilw9lour.fsf@suse.de \
    --to=rpalethorpe@suse.de \
    --cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.