From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:53873 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965701AbbD1QE6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:04:58 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Amitkumar Karwar Cc: Andreas Fenkart , "linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" , Avinash Patil Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mwifiex: sdio: bug: dead-lock in card reset References: <1428916704-9635-1-git-send-email-afenkart@gmail.com> <1428916704-9635-2-git-send-email-afenkart@gmail.com> <5FF020A1CFFEEC49BD1E09530C4FF5951B16DFB8F9@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:04:52 +0300 In-Reply-To: <5FF020A1CFFEEC49BD1E09530C4FF5951B16DFB8F9@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com> (Amitkumar Karwar's message of "Mon, 13 Apr 2015 03:27:25 -0700") Message-ID: <87iocg5jdn.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20150428_180502_750511_39FD7444) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Amitkumar Karwar writes: > Hi Andreas, > > Thanks for the patch series. > >> >> Card reset is implemented by removing/re-adding the adapter instance. >> This is implemented by removing the mmc host, which will then trigger a >> cascade of removal callbacks including mwifiex_sdio_remove. >> The dead-lock results in the latter function, trying to cancel the work >> item executing the mmc host removal. This patch adds a driver level, not >> adapter level, work struct to break the dead-lock >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Fenkart >> --- >> drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h | 1 - >> drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sdio.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> ------ >> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> > > We had recently submitted a patch to address this issue. So these two > patches won't be needed now. > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg135146.html > > Could you please check and let us know if you have any suggestions for > improvement? Ok, so we are talking about this commit which apparently fell through the cracks: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-drivers-next.git/commit/?id=2f5872b60146 Like I said as a reply to patch 1, using static variables for this is ugly. Isn't there really any better way to handle the problem? -- Kalle Valo