All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: "\"Oleg A. Arkhangelsky\"" <sysoleg@yandex.ru>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Inconsistent perf top output
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 21:10:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ioqlkced.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <645781396449095@web21h.yandex.ru> (Oleg A. Arkhangelsky's message of "Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:31:35 +0400")

"\"Oleg A. Arkhangelsky\"" <sysoleg@yandex.ru> writes:

Better asked on netdev. Copied here. It's unlikely to be a perf problem.
You better specify what kernel version you have.

> Hello,
>
> I'm profiling Linux IP packet forwarding performance. In common case I see this
> functions eating most of CPU cycles.
>
> 13735.00 22.5% build_skb  
> 5138.00   8.4% ipt_do_table 
> 4750.00   7.8% fib_table_lookup
> 3519.00   5.8% ixgbe_clean_rx_irq
> 2836.00   4.6% nf_iterate
> 1530.00   2.5% dev_queue_xmit
>
> Looks good. But accidentally I run tcpdump program on one of the NICs related
> to my test. After killing tcpdump I see that top is different:
>
> 6362.00 10.3% fib_table_lookup
> 6227.00 10.1% ipt_do_table
> 4300.00  7.0% ixgbe_clean_rx_irq
> 3771.00  6.1% nf_iterate
> 3284.00  5.3% build_skb
> 2179.00  3.5% ixgbe_xmit_frame_ring
>
> Dramatic change in build_skb() cpu cycles. But tcpdump is not active anymore.
> More than this, if I stop pktgen on traffic generator PC for a few seconds and
> start it again without any other changes, I see that build_skb() is top offender
> again. Running tcpdump again and killing it move fib_table_lookup() or
> ipt_do_table() (they are pretty same in cpu cycles) to the top. So this behavior
> is reproducible.
>
> I just have no sane explanation to such strange behavior. Maybe someone have?
>
> Thank you!

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only

      reply	other threads:[~2014-04-07  4:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-02 14:31 Inconsistent perf top output "Oleg A. Arkhangelsky"
2014-04-07  4:10 ` Andi Kleen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ioqlkced.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sysoleg@yandex.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.