From: Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
kernel@collabora.com,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: lib: xor-neon: move pragma options to makefile
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:17:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0upjyjx.fsf@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXEpD1pp5uzOMeSYhgS_dzOysKuPMOMNgivUx58PGUdMJw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 22:23, Adrian Ratiu
> <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Using a pragma like GCC optimize is a bad idea because it tags
>> all functions with an __attribute__((optimize)) which replaces
>> optimization options rather than appending so could result in
>> dropping important flags. Not recommended for production use.
>>
>> Because these options should always be enabled for this file,
>> it's better to set them via command line. tree-vectorize is on
>> by default in Clang, but it doesn't hurt to make it explicit.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
>> Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
>> Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com> ---
>> arch/arm/lib/Makefile | 2 +- arch/arm/lib/xor-neon.c | 10
>> ---------- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/Makefile b/arch/arm/lib/Makefile
>> index 6d2ba454f25b..12d31d1a7630 100644 ---
>> a/arch/arm/lib/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/lib/Makefile @@ -45,6
>> +45,6 @@ $(obj)/csumpartialcopyuser.o:
>> $(obj)/csumpartialcopygeneric.S
>>
>> ifeq ($(CONFIG_KERNEL_MODE_NEON),y)
>> NEON_FLAGS := -march=armv7-a
>> -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=neon
>> - CFLAGS_xor-neon.o += $(NEON_FLAGS) +
>> CFLAGS_xor-neon.o += $(NEON_FLAGS) -ftree-vectorize
>> -Wno-unused-variable
>> obj-$(CONFIG_XOR_BLOCKS) += xor-neon.o
>> endif
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/xor-neon.c b/arch/arm/lib/xor-neon.c
>> index e1e76186ec23..62b493e386c4 100644 ---
>> a/arch/arm/lib/xor-neon.c +++ b/arch/arm/lib/xor-neon.c @@
>> -14,16 +14,6 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> #error You should compile this file with '-march=armv7-a
>> -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=neon' #endif
>>
>> -/* - * Pull in the reference implementations while instructing
>> GCC (through - * -ftree-vectorize) to attempt to exploit
>> implicit parallelism and emit - * NEON instructions. - */
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC -#pragma GCC optimize "tree-vectorize"
>> -#endif - -#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-variable"
>> #include <asm-generic/xor.h>
>>
>> struct xor_block_template const xor_block_neon_inner = {
>> -- 2.29.2
>>
>
> So what is the status now here? How does putting
> -ftree-vectorize on the command line interact with Clang?
Clang needs to be fixed separately as -ftree-vectorize does not
change anything, the option is enabled by default.
I know it sucks to have such a silent failure, but it's always
been there (the "upgrade your GCC" warning during Clang builds was
bogus) and I do not want to rush a Clang fix without fully
understanding it.
Warning Clang users that the optimization doesn't work was
discussed but dropped because users can't do anything about it.
If we are positively certain this is a kernel bug and not a Clang
bug (i.e. the xor-neon use case is not enabling/triggering the
optimization properly) I could add a TODO comment in the code
FWIW.
Adrian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
kernel@collabora.com,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: lib: xor-neon: move pragma options to makefile
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:17:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0upjyjx.fsf@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXEpD1pp5uzOMeSYhgS_dzOysKuPMOMNgivUx58PGUdMJw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 22:23, Adrian Ratiu
> <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Using a pragma like GCC optimize is a bad idea because it tags
>> all functions with an __attribute__((optimize)) which replaces
>> optimization options rather than appending so could result in
>> dropping important flags. Not recommended for production use.
>>
>> Because these options should always be enabled for this file,
>> it's better to set them via command line. tree-vectorize is on
>> by default in Clang, but it doesn't hurt to make it explicit.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
>> Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
>> Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com> ---
>> arch/arm/lib/Makefile | 2 +- arch/arm/lib/xor-neon.c | 10
>> ---------- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/Makefile b/arch/arm/lib/Makefile
>> index 6d2ba454f25b..12d31d1a7630 100644 ---
>> a/arch/arm/lib/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/lib/Makefile @@ -45,6
>> +45,6 @@ $(obj)/csumpartialcopyuser.o:
>> $(obj)/csumpartialcopygeneric.S
>>
>> ifeq ($(CONFIG_KERNEL_MODE_NEON),y)
>> NEON_FLAGS := -march=armv7-a
>> -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=neon
>> - CFLAGS_xor-neon.o += $(NEON_FLAGS) +
>> CFLAGS_xor-neon.o += $(NEON_FLAGS) -ftree-vectorize
>> -Wno-unused-variable
>> obj-$(CONFIG_XOR_BLOCKS) += xor-neon.o
>> endif
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/xor-neon.c b/arch/arm/lib/xor-neon.c
>> index e1e76186ec23..62b493e386c4 100644 ---
>> a/arch/arm/lib/xor-neon.c +++ b/arch/arm/lib/xor-neon.c @@
>> -14,16 +14,6 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> #error You should compile this file with '-march=armv7-a
>> -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=neon' #endif
>>
>> -/* - * Pull in the reference implementations while instructing
>> GCC (through - * -ftree-vectorize) to attempt to exploit
>> implicit parallelism and emit - * NEON instructions. - */
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC -#pragma GCC optimize "tree-vectorize"
>> -#endif - -#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-variable"
>> #include <asm-generic/xor.h>
>>
>> struct xor_block_template const xor_block_neon_inner = {
>> -- 2.29.2
>>
>
> So what is the status now here? How does putting
> -ftree-vectorize on the command line interact with Clang?
Clang needs to be fixed separately as -ftree-vectorize does not
change anything, the option is enabled by default.
I know it sucks to have such a silent failure, but it's always
been there (the "upgrade your GCC" warning during Clang builds was
bogus) and I do not want to rush a Clang fix without fully
understanding it.
Warning Clang users that the optimization doesn't work was
discussed but dropped because users can't do anything about it.
If we are positively certain this is a kernel bug and not a Clang
bug (i.e. the xor-neon use case is not enabling/triggering the
optimization properly) I could add a TODO comment in the code
FWIW.
Adrian
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-13 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 21:24 [PATCH v2 0/2] xor-neon: Remove GCC warn & pragmas Adrian Ratiu
2020-11-12 21:24 ` Adrian Ratiu
2020-11-12 21:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arm: lib: xor-neon: remove unnecessary GCC < 4.6 warning Adrian Ratiu
2020-11-12 21:24 ` Adrian Ratiu
2020-11-12 21:38 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-12 21:38 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-13 7:49 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-13 7:49 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-13 11:07 ` Adrian Ratiu
2020-11-13 11:07 ` Adrian Ratiu
2020-11-13 11:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-13 11:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-13 11:59 ` Adrian Ratiu
2020-11-13 11:59 ` Adrian Ratiu
2020-11-12 21:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: lib: xor-neon: move pragma options to makefile Adrian Ratiu
2020-11-12 21:24 ` Adrian Ratiu
2020-11-12 21:40 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-12 21:40 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-12 21:50 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-11-12 21:50 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-11-13 7:50 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-13 7:50 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-13 11:17 ` Adrian Ratiu [this message]
2020-11-13 11:17 ` Adrian Ratiu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k0upjyjx.fsf@collabora.com \
--to=adrian.ratiu@collabora.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.