From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=1dCa=6A=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676B5C2BA2B
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:35:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C046206D5
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:35:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1728097AbgDPVfb (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:35:31 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47126 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727799AbgDPVfa (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:35:30 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56A46C061A0C
        for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de)
        by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
        (Exim 4.80)
        (envelope-from <tglx@linutronix.de>)
        id 1jPCAN-0006v1-Pt; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:35:23 +0200
Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 04CEB100C51; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:35:22 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
        Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Split lock enumeration cleanup and fixes
In-Reply-To: <20200416205754.21177-1-tony.luck@intel.com>
References: <20200416205754.21177-1-tony.luck@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:35:22 +0200
Message-ID: <87k12fm7vp.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0
X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: -
X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required,  ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> writes:
> Need to revisit the sequence of operations when testing for the
> split lock detect feature. It is model specific, so we must check
> the model number before looking at CORE_CAPABILITIES.
>
> I marked it all for stable ... some tweaking would be needed if
> the  X86_MATCH_INTEL stuff from v5.7 doesn't get backported.

Why stable? The split lock stuff got merged post 5.6.

Thanks,

        tglx