From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C329DC04AB6 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:45:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CAB426927 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:45:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9CAB426927 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59786 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXibI-0007uO-SG for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 04:45:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40945) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXiZe-0006XG-Qf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 04:44:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXiLc-0003Vr-Ea for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 04:29:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXiLc-0003Uu-9g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 04:29:40 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ACEA30821F4; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:29:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-117-223.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.223]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BAD510013D9; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B0DA511386A0; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 10:29:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: Aleksandar Markovic References: <20190529150853.9772-1-armbru@redhat.com> <20190529150853.9772-3-armbru@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 10:29:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Aleksandar Markovic's message of "Fri, 31 May 2019 00:40:35 +0200") Message-ID: <87k1e3t6kw.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.47]); Mon, 03 Jun 2019 08:29:39 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS: Improve section headlines X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Cornelia Huck , =?utf-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Aleksandar Markovic writes: > On May 29, 2019 5:09 PM, "Markus Armbruster" wrote: >> >> When scripts/get_maintainer.pl reports something like >> >> John Doe (maintainer:Overall) >> >> the user is left to wonder *which* of our three "Overall" sections >> applies. We have three, one each under "Guest CPU cores (TCG)", >> "Guest CPU Cores (KVM)", and "Overall usermode emulation". >> >> Rename sections under >> >> * "Guest CPU cores (TCG)" from "FOO" to "FOO CPU cores (TCG)" >> >> * "Guest CPU Cores (KVM)" from "FOO" to "FOO CPU cores (KVM)" >> >> * "Guest CPU Cores (Xen)" from "FOO" to "FOO CPU cores (Xen)" >> > > In its essence definitely not a bad idea, but I must admit I tend to agree > with Philippe the new titles sound confusing, odd, artificial. Perhaps the > better alternative could be: > > =E2=80=9CFOO TCG guest=E2=80=9D > =E2=80=9CFOO KVM guest=E2=80=9D > =E2=80=9CFOO Xen guest=E2=80=9D Other suggestions mentioned so far: "FOO CPUs (TCG)" "TCG FOO CPUs" and same for KVM and Xen. I guess mentioning target first, accelerator second, no parenthesis makes sense. That leaves "guest" vs. "CPUs". Which one's closer to the truth? >> * "Architecture support" from "FOO" to "FOO general architecture >> support" >> > > Here we have a kind of strange situation with S390 architecture - it is t= he > only one present in this way in MAINTAINERS. Othrr than that, your new > wording looks fine to me. Yes, it's odd. But it's what works for the S390 maintainers. >> * "Tiny Code Generator (TCG)" from "FOO target" to "FOO TCG target" >> > > I think this one you got it right. Thanks!