From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7A3C433DF for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 23:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7455020674 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 23:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728085AbgESXnR (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 19:43:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59148 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725998AbgESXnR (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 19:43:17 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BBF9C061A0E; Tue, 19 May 2020 16:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jbBsV-0004NU-41; Wed, 20 May 2020 01:42:32 +0200 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6D1E3100D00; Wed, 20 May 2020 01:42:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: "Ahmed S. Darwish" , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , "Paul E. McKenney" , "Sebastian A. Siewior" , Steven Rostedt , LKML , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/25] net: core: device_rename: Use rwsem instead of a seqcount In-Reply-To: <20200519161141.5fbab730@hermes.lan> References: <20200519214547.352050-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de> <20200519214547.352050-2-a.darwish@linutronix.de> <20200519150159.4d91af93@hermes.lan> <87v9kr5zt7.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20200519161141.5fbab730@hermes.lan> Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 01:42:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87lfln5w61.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Hemminger writes: > On Wed, 20 May 2020 00:23:48 +0200 > Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> No. We did not. -ENOTESTCASE > > Please try, it isn't that hard.. > > # time for ((i=0;i<1000;i++)); do ip li add dev dummy$i type dummy; done > > real 0m17.002s > user 0m1.064s > sys 0m0.375s And that solves the incorrectness of the current code in which way?