From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433BFC433DF for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 08:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D03120709 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 08:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726717AbgESI0O (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 04:26:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56454 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726150AbgESI0O (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 04:26:14 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9FB5C061A0C for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 01:26:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jaxYl-0003ps-OZ; Tue, 19 May 2020 10:25:11 +0200 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EB9E21006A1; Tue, 19 May 2020 10:25:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: LKML , X86 ML , "Paul E. McKenney" , Andy Lutomirski , Alexandre Chartre , Frederic Weisbecker , Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Masami Hiramatsu , Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Joel Fernandes , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Brian Gerst , Mathieu Desnoyers , Josh Poimboeuf , Will Deacon , Tom Lendacky , Wei Liu , Michael Kelley , Jason Chen CJ , Zhao Yakui , "Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" Subject: Re: [patch V6 09/37] x86/entry: Split idtentry_enter/exit() In-Reply-To: References: <20200515234547.710474468@linutronix.de> <20200515235125.330961133@linutronix.de> Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 10:25:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87lflouyah.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andy Lutomirski writes: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 5:10 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> >> Split the implementation of idtentry_enter/exit() out into inline functions >> so that variants of idtentry_enter/exit() can be implemented without >> duplicating code. >> > After reading just this patch, I don't see how it helps anything. > Maybe it'll make more sense after I read more of the series. I hope so :)