From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D92BC282C2 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45AA3218B0 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="PQYOcEW0"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="PQYOcEW0" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726561AbfBGJKK (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 04:10:10 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:43926 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726294AbfBGJKK (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 04:10:10 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 90708607F4; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:10:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1549530609; bh=ijna64S13BIR+2xf/ZgtuhbTtbk5hAUKyvcKJDkOO1Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=PQYOcEW0MyFuohshvSLEFYiaiDVjvhQnANoW0WqxZl4jQB59DdeEkEWhhkYwyt9mF YmujIAQNRaFmDNA11URVL+uhAwP1hjJIAzIJcqhZGgC5Yx3f9P9/gX5QCLNhBAsVZh fnkd+S4V+27AvAkbUMsnA7nWcLRVTUzB46ZyZqtY= Received: from potku.adurom.net (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D1936055C; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:10:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1549530609; bh=ijna64S13BIR+2xf/ZgtuhbTtbk5hAUKyvcKJDkOO1Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=PQYOcEW0MyFuohshvSLEFYiaiDVjvhQnANoW0WqxZl4jQB59DdeEkEWhhkYwyt9mF YmujIAQNRaFmDNA11URVL+uhAwP1hjJIAzIJcqhZGgC5Yx3f9P9/gX5QCLNhBAsVZh fnkd+S4V+27AvAkbUMsnA7nWcLRVTUzB46ZyZqtY= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 4D1936055C Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Surabhi Vishnoi Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Add a condtion to fill the LDPC capability correctly References: <1548999262-25353-1-git-send-email-svishnoi@codeaurora.org> <877eefefh3.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 11:10:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Surabhi Vishnoi's message of "Wed, 06 Feb 2019 19:21:41 +0530") Message-ID: <87lg2s9d75.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org + lists Surabhi Vishnoi writes: > On 2019-02-04 21:02, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Surabhi Vishnoi writes: >> >>> The firmware advertises the LDPC support information for HT in >>> HT capability info in the wmi service ready event. To provide >>> granularity, firmware now advertises WMI_HT_CAP_RX_LDPC and >>> WMI_HT_CAP_TX_LDPC separately. To support LDPC, host should >>> also check for WMI_HT_CAP_RX_LDPC and WMI_HT_CAP_TX_LDPC in HT >>> capabilities. >>> >>> Add a condition to existing logic in host to know whether firmware >>> supports LDPC or not. >>> >>> Tested HW: WCN3990 >>> Tested SW: WLAN.HL.2.0 >> >> Can you give exact firmware version you tested, please? I'll add it to >> the commit log. >> >> I'll also fix the typo "condtion" in the title. > > > Hi Kalle, > > The Fw version tested are: > Tested FW: WLAN.HL.3.1-00784-QCAHLSWMTPLZ-1, > WLAN.HL.2.0-01617-QCAHLSWMTPLZ-1 Thanks. But please do not drop the lists, otherwise patchwork won't see this. -- Kalle Valo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1grfhE-0002pR-94 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 09:10:13 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Add a condtion to fill the LDPC capability correctly References: <1548999262-25353-1-git-send-email-svishnoi@codeaurora.org> <877eefefh3.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 11:10:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Surabhi Vishnoi's message of "Wed, 06 Feb 2019 19:21:41 +0530") Message-ID: <87lg2s9d75.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Surabhi Vishnoi Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org + lists Surabhi Vishnoi writes: > On 2019-02-04 21:02, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Surabhi Vishnoi writes: >> >>> The firmware advertises the LDPC support information for HT in >>> HT capability info in the wmi service ready event. To provide >>> granularity, firmware now advertises WMI_HT_CAP_RX_LDPC and >>> WMI_HT_CAP_TX_LDPC separately. To support LDPC, host should >>> also check for WMI_HT_CAP_RX_LDPC and WMI_HT_CAP_TX_LDPC in HT >>> capabilities. >>> >>> Add a condition to existing logic in host to know whether firmware >>> supports LDPC or not. >>> >>> Tested HW: WCN3990 >>> Tested SW: WLAN.HL.2.0 >> >> Can you give exact firmware version you tested, please? I'll add it to >> the commit log. >> >> I'll also fix the typo "condtion" in the title. > > > Hi Kalle, > > The Fw version tested are: > Tested FW: WLAN.HL.3.1-00784-QCAHLSWMTPLZ-1, > WLAN.HL.2.0-01617-QCAHLSWMTPLZ-1 Thanks. But please do not drop the lists, otherwise patchwork won't see this. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k