From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRbZY-0003gS-Mb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:49:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRbZT-0001LI-7Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:49:11 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:29803) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRbZS-0001KP-Uw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:49:07 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u6P8hnwF088057 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:49:06 -0400 Received: from e23smtp01.au.ibm.com (e23smtp01.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.143]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 24c4nqpxmj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:49:05 -0400 Received: from localhost by e23smtp01.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:49:01 +1000 From: Nikunj A Dadhania In-Reply-To: <20160725012619.GH24621@voom.fritz.box> References: <1469263490-19130-1-git-send-email-nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1469263490-19130-2-git-send-email-nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160725012619.GH24621@voom.fritz.box> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:18:52 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <87lh0q85mz.fsf@abhimanyu.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 01/13] target-ppc: Introduce Power9 family List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Gibson Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, rth@twiddle.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com David Gibson writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 02:14:38PM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote: >> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" >> >> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V >> [ rebased and added POWER9 alias and POWER9 SPAPR core ] >> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania > > I can't really review this until the series is a bit more polished and > we have a better idea how the handling of the POWER9 MMU is going to > work. As it stands, this sets the P9 MMU type to something that only > makes sense in guest context, not host context. Will send a patch without P9 MMU changes and have a FIXME to add it. Regards Nikunj