From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRbC3-0004U5-Dk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 02:52:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRbBz-0004Zo-CG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 02:52:39 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1453978470-222624-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <1453978688-222752-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <20160128140212.GS3869@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160128180031.1d940e2f@nial.brq.redhat.com> <20160203175504.GI26314@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160203205556-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <56B33676.6000502@redhat.com> <56B338F3.8000500@suse.de> <56B33C2A.8030405@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:52:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <56B33C2A.8030405@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:55:22 +0100") Message-ID: <87mvrfd268.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qdev & hw/core owner? (was Re: [PATCH v19 7/9] machine: add properties to compat_props incrementaly) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Peter Maydell , Eduardo Habkost , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , ghammer@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann , david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, Igor Mammedov , lcapitulino@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com, Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= , Marcel Apfelbaum , rth@twiddle.net Paolo Bonzini writes: > On 04/02/2016 12:41, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >> You're talking about machine, right? Some time ago I had proposed Marcel >> who initially worked on it, but I'm fine with anyone taking it. > > Yes. > >> For some (but not all) core qdev parts related to the (stalled) QOM >> migration I've been taking care of via qom-next. Last time this came up >> you didn't want anyone to be M: for qdev, so maybe we can use R: so that >> at least people automatically get CC'ed and we avoid this recurring >> discussion? > > I might have changed my mind on that. You definitely should be M: for qd= ev. Yes. Would you like co-maintainers for just qdev, for QOM+qdev, or simply add qdev to your QOM portfolio?